[Pw_forum] NEB Calculation with Ti and Graphene
Ettore Baldini Neto
neto.baldini at gmail.com
Wed Dec 22 12:18:33 CET 2010
Dear Eyvaz,
Thanks for the answer. Although, I could not find the similar topic in the forum archives. Maybe I'm not searching well.
The system relaxed very well. Reading the tutorial I thought it could be the pseudopotential but since the structure is fine I do not think so.
Cheers,
Ettore
***************************************************************************
Dr. Ettore Baldini-Neto
Researcher. Wernher von Braun Center for Advanced Research,
Campinas, Brazil
****************************************************************************
On Dec 17, 2010, at 8:50 PM, Eyvaz Isaev wrote:
> Dear Ettore,
>
>
> The best hints are
>
> 1) Searching the forum archive, as the same question was submitted just few
> days ago.
> 2) Read User's Guide, page 54 (for QE 4.2)
>
> Hope this will help you to find the answer to fix your problem.
>
> Bests,
> Eyvaz.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> Prof. Eyvaz Isaev,
> Department of Physics, Chemistry, and Biology (IFM), Linkoping University,
> Sweden
>
> Theoretical Physics Department, Moscow State Institute of Steel & Alloys,
> Russia,
>
> isaev at ifm.liu.se, eyvaz_isaev at yahoo.com
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Ettore Baldini Neto <neto.baldini at gmail.com>
> To: PWSCF Forum <pw_forum at pwscf.org>
> Sent: Fri, December 17, 2010 11:15:58 PM
> Subject: [Pw_forum] NEB Calculation with Ti and Graphene
>
> Dear users,
>
> I'm playing with a NEB calculation involving one Ti atom in a graphene
> monolayer.
> The calculation crashes due to diagonalization problems according to the message
> below.
> *******************************************
> task # 8
> from cdiaghg : error # 434
> diagonalization (ZHEGV*) failed
> ********************************************
>
> In what follows I copied my input file (without the atomic positions in order to
> make it small for the readers)
> Any hint? Am I doing something very wrong?
> I'm not using for now polarization for Ti for now in order to make things
> simpler. I'm planning to include it soon.
> Also, I'm using a large ecut but I figured out that for graphene and for this
> pseudo 35-40Ry might work fine.
>
> title = 'Graphene mono layer'
> calculation = "neb" ,
> restart_mode = 'from_scratch' ,
> outdir='/home/usuarios/baldini/espresso-4.2.1/tmp/' ,
> pseudo_dir = '/home/usuarios/baldini/espresso-4.2.1/pseudo' ,
> etot_conv_thr = 1.0E-3 ,
> forc_conv_thr = 1.0D-4 ,
> nstep=10,
> prefix='1MLG_Ti_NEB',
> /
> &SYSTEM
> ibrav = 0.,
> ntyp = 2 ,
> nat = 33 ,
> ecutwfc = 50.0 ,
> ecutrho = 400.0,
> occupations = 'smearing' ,
> degauss = 0.02,
> smearing = 'mv' ,
> /
> &ELECTRONS
> conv_thr = 1.0d-7 ,
> mixing_beta = 0.4 ,
> /
> &IONS
> num_of_images = 4,
> opt_scheme = "broyden",
> path_thr = 0.03D0,
> /
> ATOMIC_SPECIES
> C 12.0107 C.pbe-van_ak.UPF
> Ti 47.8670 Ti.pbe-sp-van_ak.UPF
> CELL_PARAMETERS
> 16.12131954 9.383047808 0.0000000
> 0.00000000 18.658162370 0.0000000
> 0.0000000 0.000000000 56.6893424
> ATOMIC_POSITIONS angstrom
> first_image
> ...
> last image
> .......
> K_POINTS {automatic}
> 6.0 6.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
>
>
> Thanks a lot and best regards
>
> ************************************************************************
> Dr. Ettore Baldini-Neto,
> Researcher at Wernher von Braun Center of Advanced Research
> Campinas, Brazil
> ***********************************************************************
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
More information about the users
mailing list