[Pw_forum] nonzero dos at Fermi level
Stefano de Gironcoli
degironc at sissa.it
Fri Aug 27 23:18:32 CEST 2010
the gaussian smearing contribution is non-zero hence your system is not
an insulator but has a non-zero DOS at the Fermi energy.
are you sure that the structure is ok?
I dont know why it is so and why the integrated dos around EF does not
equal nelec... how is your input for the dos ? are you using the same
number of points and the same smearing width ?
stefanno
Nguyen Doan Sau wrote:
> Hi there,
> I have a problem related to DOS at fermi level. Let me start with my scf file first
> -------------
> &system
> ibrav=0, celldm(1)=0 , nat=22, ntyp=4,
> ecutwfc =37.0, occupations='smearing', smearing='gauss', degauss=0.01, nelec=156
> nspin= 1,
> /
> &electrons
> electron_maxstep= 300
> mixing_mode = 'plain'
> mixing_beta = 0.2
> conv_thr = 1.0d-6
> diagonalization= 'david'
> /
> --------------
> My pseudopotentials are norm conversing, which are generated by ld1.x and their transferability is OK.
> here is the output
> ----------
> the Fermi energy is 3.4391 ev
>
> ! total energy = -1213.21835062 Ry
> Harris-Foulkes estimate = -1213.21835085 Ry
> estimated scf accuracy < 0.00000034 Ry
>
> The total energy is the sum of the following terms:
>
> one-electron contribution = -711.80653324 Ry
> hartree contribution = 352.57845405 Ry
> xc contribution = -222.78424774 Ry
> ewald contribution = -631.18916691 Ry
> smearing contrib. (-TS) = -0.01685678 Ry
>
> convergence has been achieved in 32 iterations
> ----------------------
> and Dos
> 3.000 0.2551E+02 0.1178E+03
> 3.100 0.2931E+02 0.1207E+03
> 3.200 0.3391E+02 0.1241E+03
> 3.300 0.3375E+02 0.1275E+03
> 3.400 0.2724E+02 0.1302E+03
> 3.500 0.2299E+02 0.1325E+03
> 3.600 0.2335E+02 0.1348E+03
> 3.700 0.2043E+02 0.1369E+03
> 3.800 0.1297E+02 0.1381E+03
> 3.900 0.9369E+01 0.1391E+03
> 4.000 0.8969E+01 0.1400E+03
>
> --------------
> My question are concerned to:
> + DOS is still not zero at fermi level E=3.4391
> + Integrated DOS is not equal number of electron (156) , even I try DeltaE=0.001
> -------------
> I have thought about the question
> +First, My compound is insulator, an oxide with optical bandgap of 4 eV. But in scf input, I use occupations='smearing'. Shoud I change it to occupations='fixed' and increase nbnd>156/2 and delete smearing variable.
> ------------
> Is there anyone had this problem before and please help me to fix that.
>
> Sau Nguyen
> U of Houston
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>
More information about the users
mailing list