[Pw_forum] Improve convergence, slab and electric field.
joaquin peralta
jperaltac at gmail.com
Fri Aug 27 17:29:20 CEST 2010
Dear pw_forum
I try to simulate a metallic slab under a electric field. In order to
improve the convergence, I checked this web page :
http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_5f15ead20100cw4d.html
I tried all the suggestion (except band number increase) and the process
continue with a very slow convergence, after 283 iterations the ethr=1.2E-9.
The important part of the input file is :
&CONTROL
calculation = 'scf'
...
tefield = .true.
dipfield = .true.
/
&SYSTEM
ibrav = 0
celldm(1) = 1.0
nat = 21
ntyp = 1
ecutwfc = 30
ecutrho = 500
degauss = 0.03
occupations = 'smearing'
smearing = 'mv'
nspin = 2
starting_magnetization= 0.1
edir = 3
emaxpos = 0.9
eopreg = 0.2
eamp = 0.019447
/
&ELECTRONS
electron_maxstep = 300
mixing_mode = 'local-TF'
mixing_beta = 0.1
mixing_ndim = 10
/
...
K_POINTS (automatic)
6 6 6 0 0 0
...
This process use approx 5Gb of data in the associated files.
My question are,
-If I increase the band number, The space disk will be more?
-Do you have suggestion about how to proceed in order to avoid this I/O
increase. and improve the convergence or velocity.
-I'm (over/under)estimating some previous value?, k-points, mixing_*, ecut*?
Thanks in advance
Joaquin Peralta
Materials Science and Engineering
Iowa State University.
--
----------------------------------------------------
Group of NanoMaterials
----------------------------------------------------
http://www.gnm.cl
----------------------------------------------------
Joaquín Andrés Peralta Camposano
----------------------------------------------------
http://www.lpmd.cl/jperalta
In a world without frontiers,
who needs Gates and Win.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20100827/16bd0a62/attachment.html>
More information about the users
mailing list