[Pw_forum] performance of occupation='fixed' and ='smearing'
shypirate
shypirate at gmail.com
Thu Sep 10 09:36:35 CEST 2009
I am using CG style diagonalization, in fact.
2009-09-10
shypirate
发件人: Gabriele Sclauzero
发送时间: 2009-09-10 15:23:48
收件人: PWSCF Forum
抄送:
主题: Re: [Pw_forum] performance of occupation='fixed' and ='smearing'
shypirate wrote:
> Dear all:
> When I use pw.x, I find that performance of different occupations are
> different. If I set occupation='smearing', it takes about 6 minutes for
> one diagonalization step, but 24 minutes for occupation='fixed'. I have
> set the same "nbnd" and "K_POINTS" for both. My question is, why is the
> performance difference?
If it's like you say, the only possible difference that comes to my mind is in the number
of iterations used in the Davidson algorithm for diagonalization (though I never thought
it could depend on the occupations method). Please check for the keyword "iterations"
(which is printed together with the number of iterations after each diagonalization step):
> grep iterations yourfile
and let me know the output.
GS
> Best Wishes,
> Y.P.Wang
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
--
o ------------------------------------------------ o
| Gabriele Sclauzero, PhD Student |
| c/o: SISSA & CNR-INFM Democritos, |
| via Beirut 2-4, 34014 Trieste (Italy) |
| email: sclauzer at sissa.it |
| phone: +39 040 3787 511 |
| skype: gurlonotturno |
o ------------------------------------------------ o
_______________________________________________
Pw_forum mailing list
Pw_forum at pwscf.org
http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20090910/3b271bb5/attachment.html>
More information about the users
mailing list