[Pw_forum] using ev.x
Stefano de Gironcoli
degironc at sissa.it
Wed Sep 9 09:39:35 CEST 2009
Dear Saibabu,
using your data with ev.x I obtain very similar results using birch 1
& 2 and murnaghan EoS while very different when using keane EoS... this
indicates that keane EoS has met some problem (at least with your data...)
I notice that your data points span less than 1% around the
equilibrium geometry. Usually one takes a larger range (let's say 5-10
%) which reduces the signal/noise ratio.
hope this helps
stefano de Gironcoli - SISSA and DEMOCRITOS
udayagiri sai babu wrote:
> Dear stefano baroni
> I tried that as well i am getting the same value (255gpa). This is the
> data i am using
>
> 5.35 -174.156857800
> 5.36 -174.156934850
> 5.37 -174.156989300
> 5.38 -174.156990580
> 5.39 -174.156955990
> 5.4 -174.156869280
>
> this is one of the input file
>
> &control
> calculation = 'scf',
> restart_mode='from_scratch',
> outdir='/home/sai/temp',
> prefix='chromium'
> pseudo_dir='/home/sai/softwares/espresso-4.0.1/pseudo/',
> tstress = .TRUE.,
> tprnfor = .TRUE.,
> /
> &system
> ibrav=3
> celldm(1)=5.350000,
> nat=1,
> ntyp=1
> ecutwfc=30,
> ecutrho=300,
> occupations='smearing',
> smearing='mv',
> degauss=0.012000
> /
> &electrons
> conv_thr=1.D-8,
> diagonalization='david',
> mixing_mode='plain',
> mixing_beta= 0.7
> /
> ATOMIC_SPECIES
> Cr 51.9961 Cr.pw91-sp-van.UPF
> ATOMIC_POSITIONS (crystal)
> Cr 0.00000000 0.00000000 0.00000000
> K_POINTS {automatic}
> 12 12 12 0 0 0
>
> can you suggest me anything
>
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 1:03 AM, Stefano Baroni <baroni at sissa.it
> <mailto:baroni at sissa.it>> wrote:
>
> How about trying to fit a very accurate set of data around the
> minimum with a parabola and calculate thus the bulk modulus? Have
> you tries to plot the resulting fitted curves? which one fits best
> the raw data? Udaygiri: in Science (as well as in Life) there is
> no free lunch ... Enjoy Science, no less than Life. SB
>
> On Sep 8, 2009, at 9:04 PM, udayagiri sai babu wrote:
>
>>
>> hi all
>> i am using ev.x file given in the pw_tools directory to calculate
>> bulk modulus and lattice parameter values of chromium. i used
>> murnaghan equation of state to fit my data i got bulk modulus of
>> 256 gpa where as my experimental value is 160 gpa but when i
>> used keane equation of state to fit the same data i got 148 gpa
>> bulk modulus
>>
>> why is this much variation? which equation of state should i use
>> for cr? because for vanadium and Ti murnagan euation of state has
>> given reasonable (<20% error) values of bulk modulus but not for Cr
>>
>> please give some suggestions
>> --
>> U.Saibabu
>> PhD student,
>> Deformation mechanisms modeling group,
>> Materials engineering department,
>> IISc Bangalore,
>> India.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pw_forum mailing list
>> Pw_forum at pwscf.org <mailto:Pw_forum at pwscf.org>
>> http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>
> ---
> Stefano Baroni - SISSA & DEMOCRITOS National Simulation Center -
> Trieste
> http://stefano.baroni.me [+39] 040 3787 406 (tel) -528 (fax) /
> stefanobaroni (skype)
>
> La morale est une logique de l'action comme la logique est une
> morale de la pensée - Jean Piaget
>
> Please, if possible, don't send me MS Word or PowerPoint attachments
> Why? See: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org <mailto:Pw_forum at pwscf.org>
> http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>
>
>
>
> --
> U.Saibabu
> PhD student,
> Deformation mechanisms modeling group,
> Materials engineering department,
> IISc Bangalore,
> India.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>
More information about the users
mailing list