[Pw_forum] PPs of Aluminum using ld1 code(including 11 valence electrons)
Jiayu Dai
daijiayu at nudt.edu.cn
Mon Oct 26 17:12:26 CET 2009
Dear Users,
I met a problem when i tried to construct a NCPP of Al using ld1. In this PP, the
2s and 2p orbitals should be considered as valence orbitals. I used the input file
below, but the generated PP did not work well according to my test for the crystal
constal and bulk modulus for Al crystal. I found the energies of orbitals in PPs
are not equal to the energies of all electron calculation. We can find the
information in the output file of ld1.x:
n l nl e AE (Ry) e PS (Ry) De AE-PS (Ry)
1 0 2S 1( 2.00) -7.94999 -6.17363 -1.77636
2 1 2P 1( 6.00) -5.11868 -3.82463 -1.29405
2 0 3S 1( 2.00) -0.56982 -0.49211 -0.07771
3 1 3P 1( 1.00) -0.19934 -0.16136 -0.03798
It is shown that the difference is so large. Lorenzo suggested to add more
projectors of 3S and 3P, but the problem seems to be there. So, how can i solve
this problem? Any suggestion is much appreciated.
The input file:
&input
title='Al',
zed=13.0,
rel=1,
config='[He] 2s2 2p6 3s2 3p1 3d-2'
iswitch=3,
dft='PBE',
/
&inputp
lloc=2,
pseudotype=2,
nlcc = .true.
tm = .true. ,
file_pseudopw='Al.pbe-tm-nc.UPF',
/
5
2S 1 0 2.00 0.00 2.00 2.00
2P 2 1 6.00 0.00 2.00 2.00
3S 2 0 2.00 0.00 2.40 2.40
3P 3 1 1.00 0.00 2.70 2.70
3D 5 2 -2.00 0.25 2.30 2.30
------------------------------
-------------------------------------------
Jiayu Dai
Department of Physics
National University of Defense Technology,
Changsha, 410073, P R China
-----------------------------------------
More information about the users
mailing list