[Pw_forum] bug in mm_dispersion.f90

[Paolo Giannozzi]

Daniel Forrer wrote:

> i'm not expert in parallelization

nor am I!

> but it seems to me that the processor index "mpime" 
> should be replaced by "me_image" if we use the 
> "intra_image_comm" communicator. Is it correct?

it is (I think). For a single image, it makes no
difference because the two are equal (I think).
Thank you, it will be fixed

P.
-- 
Paolo Giannozzi, Democritos and University of Udine, Italy