[Pw_forum] transmission calculation
Manoj Srivastava
manoj at phys.ufl.edu
Fri Jun 5 18:33:26 CEST 2009
Dear Gabriele,
Thanks for your response.
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Gabriele Sclauzero wrote:
> Quoting Manoj Srivastava <manoj at phys.ufl.edu>:
>
> > Dear PWSCF users and developers,
> > I have been trying to do the conductance calculation for the twin
> > boundary of Cu. I compared my results with previously done calculations
> > and for most K points the transmission coefficients match up very well.
> > But there are some k points that I get transmission coefficients more than
> > 1! This is not reasonable, as the maximum value of transmission
> > coefficient could be 1.I am getting 1.000345, and similar for other k
> > points.
>
> Which k-points? How many channels are there? Please send me the output
> file or post the relevant part of it.
There are quiet a few k points for which transmission is more than 1.
For example-
k( 3) = ( 0.2500000 0.0000000), wk = 0.1666667
ngper, shell number = 317 133
ngper, n2d = 317 317
Nchannels of the left tip = 1
k1(2pi/a) k2(2pi/a) E-Ef (eV)
0.0634548 0.0000000 0.0000000
Nchannels of the right tip = 1
k1(2pi/a) k2(2pi/a) E-Ef (eV)
0.1266351 0.0000000 0.0000000
to transmit
T_ij for propagating states:
1 --> 1 1.0000806
1.00008
Eigenchannel decomposition:
@ 1 0.00000 1.00008
1.00000
E-Ef(ev), T(x2 spins) = 0.0000000 2.0001613
Also for another k point -
k( 5) = ( 0.0000000 -0.2500000), wk = 0.1666667
ngper, shell number = 317 133
ngper, n2d = 317 317
Nchannels of the left tip = 1
k1(2pi/a) k2(2pi/a) E-Ef (eV)
0.0634548 0.0000000 0.0000000
Nchannels of the right tip = 1
k1(2pi/a) k2(2pi/a) E-Ef (eV)
0.1266351 0.0000000 0.0000000
to transmit
T_ij for propagating states:
1 --> 1 1.0000806
1.00008
Eigenchannel decomposition:
@ 1 0.00000 1.00008
1.00000
E-Ef(ev), T(x2 spins) = 0.0000000 2.0001613
>
> > Do you think transmission coefficients being more than 1 is just
> > numerical error of the code or there is something wrong with my input
> > file? Attached is the input file for lead and scatterign region -
>
> Transmission coefficients should be between 0 and 1. In the code there
> are many levels of approximation. Some of them may affect the results.
> Usually the two relevant parameters one needs to adjust are epsproj
> and ewind. Why are you tweaking the others? Have you tried the default?
>
>
>
>
> > ecutwfc =150.0,
>
> Why such a high value? You are using US, aren't you?
I started with low value of ecutwfc, but my transmission was more than 1,
so I started increasing ecutwfc, but still no change. And, yes I am using
USPP.
>
>
> > ATOMIC_POSITIONS
> > Cu 0.0 0.0 0.0
> > Cu -0.5 0.288675134 0.81649658
> > Cu -1.0 0.577350269 1.632993162
> >
> > K_POINTS (automatic)
> > 6 6 8 1 1 1
> > CELL_PARAMETERS {hexagonal}
> > 1.0 0.0 0.0
> > -0.5 0.8660254037844386 0.0
> > 0.0 0.0 2.449489743
>
> This shouldn't be an issue, but you could try to use ibrav=4 instead
> of ibrav=0 and specify atomic positions such that all atoms are inside
> the first primitive cell (i.e. the one with R=0)
Setting ibrav=4 or setting ibrav=0 and manually specify unit cell
should give me the same results, I believe. What is R=0 ?
>
>
>
>
>
> >
> > /
> > 6
> > 0.5000000 -0.5000000 1
> > 4.2584095E-17 0.5000000 1
>
> Why don't you specify 0.00000 instead? Should not matter anyway.
Yes, it does not matter.
>
> Gabriele Sclauzero
>
>
> SISSA & Democritos
>
>
> > 0.250000000 0.0000000 1
> > 0.1666667 0.1666667 1
> > -1.2775231E-16 -0.2500000 1
> > 0.2500000 -0.2500001 1
> > 1
> > 0.0
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Manoj Srivastava
> > University of Florida,
> > Gainesville, FL
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pw_forum mailing list
> > Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> > http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
> >
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> SISSA Webmail https://webmail.sissa.it/
> Powered by Horde http://www.horde.org/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>
Regards,
Manoj
More information about the users
mailing list