[Pw_forum] vc_relax convergence criteria

[Timothy Mason]

On Jan 6, 2009, at 4:27 , Timothy Mason wrote:

> I find that vc_relax appears to have differente convergence criteria
> depending on which algorithm I use.   why is this?

>>likely because they were written by different people.

>>Paolo


I used version 4.03.   

does anyone see value in having consistent convergence VC-relax criteria for future releases?

the documentaion has definitions for what force_conv_thresh and etot_conv_thr mean.   Do these definitions not apply to bfgs?