[Pw_forum] More ncpp2upf and fhi2upf
Paolo Giannozzi
giannozz at democritos.it
Wed Aug 19 22:14:53 CEST 2009
On Wednesday 19 August 2009 20:28, Nicole Benedek wrote:
> [...] ncpp2upf seems to be broken if you have augmentation operators
I beg your pardon: "augmentation operators" in norm conserving
pseudopotentials? and how can a converter from an obsolete format
be broken? it hasn't changed since a long time
paolo
--
Paolo Giannozzi, Democritos and Udine University
More information about the users
mailing list