[Pw_forum] Trying to clarify the dipole correction (again!)
J. J. Ramsey
jjr19 at uakron.edu
Fri Aug 14 03:53:24 CEST 2009
----- Original Message ----
> From: Stefano de Gironcoli <degironc at sissa.it>
> To: PWSCF Forum <pw_forum at pwscf.org>
> Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2009 11:59:14 AM
> Subject: Re: [Pw_forum] Trying to clarify the dipole correction (again!)
>
> Dear J.J. Ramsey
>
> at variance with what is defined in Bengtsson's paper the dipole
> potential is not discontinuous in QE but is defined by periodically
> alternating an increasing slope (associate to the "physical" electric
> field present in the cell) and a rapidly decreasing slope that should
> be located in a region of negligibly small charge density. This is done
> to avoid too sharp features in the calculation.
In other words, the discontinuity in Bengtsson's paper, where the slope is infinite, is replaced by a large but finite slope.
> so if emaxpos = 0.45 and eopreg=0.1 the region where the correction
> is physically meaningful goes from -45% to +45% of the cell and the
> regression region (that should contains no charge density) occupies
> the central 10% of the cell. This is a good setting if you center your
> slab around the origin.
I gather you mean the case where the slab is near the bottom of the unit cell.
More information about the users
mailing list