[Pw_forum] post processing with occupations defined from input
Axel Kohlmeyer
akohlmey at cmm.chem.upenn.edu
Sun Oct 26 04:12:37 CET 2008
On Fri, 24 Oct 2008, beaudet at illinois.edu wrote:
todd,
TB> pwscf users,
TB>
TB> I'm usinge QE 4.0. I've done scf (pw.x) calculations at on a
TB> molecule (25 bohr cube, gamma point only) where I have defined the
TB> occupations, i.e. occupations = 'from_input'. I would like to
TB> visualize the molecular orbitals. My input file for pp.x is as
TB> follows:
TB> Program POST-PROC v.4.0 starts ...
TB> Today is 24Oct2008 at 18:52:21
TB>
TB> %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
TB> from postproc : error # 1
TB> Post-processing with constrained magnetization is not available yet
TB> %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
TB>
TB> stopping ...
TB>
TB> Is there a workaround for this?
you mean other than implementing it yourself??
the question is, do you _need_ to set the occupations explicitly?
if yes, then you can take advantage of using open source software,
and you have the great opportunity to make something good better.
cheers,
axel.
TB>
TB> Thanks
TB>
TB> Todd Beaudet
TB> _______________________________________________
TB> Pw_forum mailing list
TB> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
TB> http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
TB>
--
=======================================================================
Axel Kohlmeyer akohlmey at cmm.chem.upenn.edu http://www.cmm.upenn.edu
Center for Molecular Modeling -- University of Pennsylvania
Department of Chemistry, 231 S.34th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6323
tel: 1-215-898-1582, fax: 1-215-573-6233, office-tel: 1-215-898-5425
=======================================================================
If you make something idiot-proof, the universe creates a better idiot.
More information about the users
mailing list