[Pw_forum] Defining an antiferromagnetic graphene nanoribbon

[Stefano Baroni]

On May 9, 2008, at 10:42 PM, Roberto G. A. Veiga wrote:

> Hi, Konstantin:
>
> thank you very much. Such a large cutoff (80 Ry) is necessary for  
> convergence? Or maybe I'm using one quite small (20 Ry)...

it depends on the PP you are using, I guess, and certainly NOT on the  
actual structure you are studying. 80 Ry seems like an appropriate  
cutoff for moderately hard norm-conserving PP's, whereas 20 Ry sounds  
like appriate for many US PP's. In either case, you better check the  
aprporiateness by yourself, through thorough convergence tests.

Stefano


>
>
> []s,
>
> Roberto
>
> Konstantin Kudin <konstantin_kudin at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hi Roberto,
>
> Here is a ribbon input that works for sure:
> https://kiev.princeton.edu/misc/rg_07.scf.in
> (get PPs from the PWSCF website)
>
> Good luck!
> Kostya

---
Stefano Baroni - SISSA  &  DEMOCRITOS National Simulation Center -  
Trieste
[+39] 040 3787 406 (tel) -528 (fax) / stefanobaroni (skype)

La morale est une logique de l'action comme la logique est une morale  
de la pensée - Jean Piaget

Please, if possible, don't  send me MS Word or PowerPoint attachments
Why? See:  http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html





-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20080510/ef313b14/attachment.html>