[Pw_forum] Mass of the atomic for relax
Paolo Giannozzi
giannozz at nest.sns.it
Mon Mar 17 18:41:43 CET 2008
Viet Bac wrote:
> I am confusing when using mass of the atomic species for relaxation. In
> the Doc/INPUT_PW, it was said that:
>
> Mass_X REAL : mass of the atomic species [amu: mass of C = 12]
> not used if calculation='scf','nscf',
> 'bands', 'phonon'
>
> So for VCS calculation, which is better when using this parameter?
I don't see anything confusing in the documentation: no dynamics,
no need for masses. For true MD, choose the real atomic masses.
For structural optimization with damped dynamics, you can set all
masses to the same number (quite arbitrary, since the only relevant
parameter is dt^2/mass): it is a form of "preconditioning".
Structural optimization with bfgs or similar algorithms will
ignore the masses. Or at least, this is what I remember.
Paolo
--
Paolo Giannozzi, Democritos and University of Udine, Italy
More information about the users
mailing list