[Pw_forum] bfgs vc-relaxation in 4.0cvs
Jess Kondor
kondor.jess at gmail.com
Mon Mar 17 00:30:56 CET 2008
Dear Javier,
Did you receive may reply with attached example I have a problem with?
thanks,
jess
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 2:36 AM, <j.antonio.montoya at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear Jess, that one is in fact one of the specific parts of the code that
> we need to test deeply. Please post your input so tha we can try to see
> under which conditions this is hapenening and fix it.
>
> Meanwhile try to use the flag "nosym" just to see if you manage to get
> reasonable results.
>
> Thanks,
>
> J. Montoya
> jmontoya at ciw.edu
>
>
> Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Jess Kondor" <kondor.jess at gmail.com>
>
> Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2008 19:02:40
> To:pw_forum at pwscf.org
> Subject: [Pw_forum] bfgs vc-relaxation in 4.0cvs
>
>
> Dear all,
>
> I have noticed that new pre-release 4.0CVS version has an option to
> optimize cell parameters using BFGS method. However, when using this option,
> the computation often fails with message "from checkallsym : not orthogonal
> operation". I'm probably wrong, but I thought that BFGS should not break
> the symmetry. Is it correct?
>
> Regards,
> JK
>
>
> --
> =====================================
> Jess Kondor
>
> PICYT, Av. Venustiano Carranza 2425-A, San Luis Potosí 78210, México
>
> =====================================
> _______________________________________________
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20080316/ce06be7b/attachment.html>
More information about the users
mailing list