[Pw_forum] (no subject)
vega lew
vegalew at hotmail.com
Sun Jul 6 19:59:56 CEST 2008
Dear all,
Now I have tested Anatase lattice parameters using new BFGS file of PWscf. The new BFGS files
seem to be perfect. The data in following table is calculated by PWscf except for the first two lines.
The first line is the experimental data at 15K of J. Am. Chem. SOC. 1987, 109, 3639-3646.
The second line is the average value calculated by CASTEP. But the value is not stable, it's
would be changed a bit of different run.
>From the third line to the bottom is the data calculated by PWscf. The value is quite stable.
The value remain the same when calculate by same number of CPUs and pools. There would
be only a little different for different number of CPUs and pools, less than 0.01% in energy.
K-point mesh Pseudopotentials Cutoff / Ry Anatase lattice parameters time a=b c Energy / Ry CPU Wall experiment* x 3.78216 9.50465 x x x CASTEP 400 eV 3.7987 9.6934 -730.11745 gamma (1X1X1) 30,240 3.39021 11.77804 -725.08174 4m18.70s 18m 9.12s 2X2X1 30,240 3.8683 9.0275 -725.48834 8m 4.25s 32m33.56s 4X4X2 25,200 3.7500 9.3829 -725.41398 9m58.82s 17m46.87s 30,240 3.7899 9.6203 -725.49520 3m41.55s 7m50.32s 40,320 3.7850 9.5716 -725.54336 8m54.73s 34m 1.43s 50,400 3.7926 9.6366 -725.59434 10m14.46s 41m 3.22s 7X7X3 30,240 3.7919 9.6058 -725.49443 31m59.60s 46m37.77s 10X10X4 30,240 3.7916 9.6067 -725.49451 31m32.94s 44m 4.11s
The input file as follows,
&CONTROL
title = 'Anatase lattice' ,
calculation = 'vc-relax' ,
restart_mode = 'from_scratch' ,
outdir = '/home/vega/espresso-4.0/tmp/' ,
wfcdir = '/tmp/' ,
pseudo_dir = '/home/vega/espresso-4.0/pseudo/' ,
prefix = 'Anatase lattice default' ,
disk_io = 'none' ,
etot_conv_thr = 0.0005 ,
forc_conv_thr = 0.0011668141375 ,
nstep = 1000 ,
/
&SYSTEM
ibrav = 6,
celldm(1) = 7.1356,
celldm(3) = 2.5122,
nat = 12,
ntyp = 2,
ecutwfc = 30 ,
ecutrho = 240 ,
/
&ELECTRONS
conv_thr = 7.3D-8 ,
/
&IONS
ion_dynamics = 'bfgs' ,
/
&CELL
cell_dynamics = 'bfgs' ,
/
ATOMIC_SPECIES
Ti 47.86700 Ti.pw91-sp-van_ak.UPF
O 15.99940 O.pw91-van_ak.UPF
ATOMIC_POSITIONS crystal
Ti 0.000000000 0.000000000 0.000000000
Ti 0.500000000 0.500000000 0.500000000
Ti 0.000000000 0.500000000 0.250000000
Ti 0.500000000 0.000000000 0.750000000
O 0.000000000 0.500000000 0.042000000
O 0.000000000 0.000000000 0.208000000
O 0.500000000 0.500000000 0.292000000
O 0.000000000 0.500000000 0.458000000
O 0.500000000 0.000000000 0.542000000
O 0.500000000 0.500000000 0.708000000
O 0.000000000 0.000000000 0.792000000
O 0.500000000 1.000000000 0.958000000
K_POINTS automatic
2 2 1 1 1 1
But it is especially strange that the total energy was -730.11745 Ry, rather different than the PWscf's results.
Also PWscf's results seems to be a litter lager than experimental data. Is it because the pseudopotential Ti.pw91-sp-van_ak.UPF underbinding for TiO2?
Vega Lew
PH.D Candidate in Chemical Engineering
State Key Laboratory of Materials-oriented Chemical Engineering
College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
Nanjing University of Technology, 210009, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
_________________________________________________________________
Discover the new Windows Vista
http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=windows+vista&mkt=en-US&form=QBRE
More information about the users
mailing list