[Pw_forum] two notations
Paolo Giannozzi
giannozz at nest.sns.it
Thu Feb 21 10:24:02 CET 2008
On Feb 21, 2008, at 24:12 , alan chen wrote:
> Is the correspondence of the notation of 'm' in PWSCF to real
> quantum number as follows: -1 => 1, 0 => 2, 1=> 3? Or you make some
> linear combinations of original quantum states and relabel them as
> m=1,2,3?
http://www.quantum-espresso.org/wiki/index.php/
Frequently_Asked_Questions#What_is_the_order_of_Ylm_components_in_projec
ted_DOS_.2F_projection_of_atomic_wavefunctions.3F
>
> Also in the output file of atomic projected DOS, we have:
> "psi = 0.974*[# 1]+0.014*[# 5]+0.007*[# 14]+0.002*[# 11]+0.001*[#
> 21]+0.001*[# 25]+''. Is 'psi' the wave function or the modulous
> square of the wave function? If 'psi' is the wave function, then
> why the coefficients in the decomposition are always positive? The
> coefficients are supposed to be the overlap of the Block state and
> one atomic orbital and are generally complex.
the printed numbers are the square moduli of the coefficients
P.
---
Paolo Giannozzi, Dept of Physics, University of Udine
via delle Scienze 208, 33100 Udine, Italy
Phone +39-0432-558216, fax +39-0432-558222
More information about the users
mailing list