[Pw_forum] anisotropy energy
vega
vegalew at hotmail.com
Sun Aug 31 12:55:00 CEST 2008
>After obtaining the optimum atomic position , for obtaining the accurate MAE , which Kpoint mesh is suitable( high K >mesh or as perviuos step(relaxation) common K mesh)?
I think you should try different K mesh and see whether the results convergenced. for example if 4x4x2 and 2x2x1 give the similar results with 1%~2% errors (maybe 5%) you may use 2x2x1 for simpleness. Also the k point mesh should compromise with the hardware.
>And what is suitable for thereshold of energy?
I think the default value is suitable for many purposes. see archive for more detail. Prof.Baroni have lectured us many times for this.
vega
=================================================================================
Vega Lew (weijia liu)
PH.D Candidate in Chemical Engineering
State Key Laboratory of Materials-oriented Chemical Engineering
College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
Nanjing University of Technology, 210009, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
From: ali kazempoor
Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2008 3:18 PM
To: pw_forum at pwscf.org
Subject: [Pw_forum] anisotropy energy
Dear all
For obtaining correct results for MAE(magnetic anisotropy energy), at first we must relax atomic positions. Does This relaxation must be done by a pseudopotential that include the spin-orbit effect or without spin -orbit in pseudopotential?
After obtaining the optimum atomic position , for obtaining the accurate MAE , which Kpoint mesh is suitable( high K mesh or as perviuos step(relaxation) common K mesh)?
And what is suitable for thereshold of energy?
thanks a lot
Ali Kazempour, Dept. Of . Phys. .Isfahan university of technology
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Pw_forum mailing list
Pw_forum at pwscf.org
http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20080831/04d1923e/attachment.html>
More information about the users
mailing list