[Pw_forum] something strange in rutile and anatase calculation
willy kohn
willykohn at gmail.com
Fri Aug 29 20:02:56 CEST 2008
Hi, Vega:
A recent result (Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 39 (2000) L847) showed that different
pseudopotential leaded to different conclusions.
Best,
Wei
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 4:28 AM, vega <vegalew at hotmail.com> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> It is known that the rutile is more stable than anatase in thermodynamics.
> Surprisingly, when I did the vc-relax calculation by QE, I found
> the calculated energy of anatase lower than rutile. Both vc-relax
> calculation for rutile and anatase onverged in 6 scf cycles and 3 bfgs
> steps, giving the final enthalpy = -362.7585836890 Ry for rutile and
> -725.5447425835 Ry for antase. So the average energy of [TiO2] unit
> is -181.3792918445 Ry for rutile and -181.386185645875 Ry for anatase. It
> looks like anatase is more stable than rutile. Do you think it was quite
> strange?
>
> To make the calculation both for anatase and rutile comparable, I used the
> same ecutwfc=40 Ry and ecutwfc=400 Ry, and a quite dense k-point mesh for
> both case, 4x4x7 for rutile and 5x5x2 for anatase.
>
> for better understanding in my calculation, please read the input file
> below,
> for anatase case,
> &CONTROL
> title = 'Anatase lattice' ,
> calculation = 'vc-relax' ,
> restart_mode = 'from_scratch' ,
> outdir =
> '/home/hjfeng/vega/TiO2/Anatase/lattice/vctest/tmp/' ,
> wfcdir = '/tmp/' ,
> pseudo_dir = '/home/hjfeng/vega/espresso-4.0/pseudo/' ,
> prefix = 'Anatase lattice' ,
> disk_io = 'none' ,
> nstep = 1000 ,
> /
> &SYSTEM
> ibrav = 6,
> celldm(1) = 7.1356,
> celldm(3) = 2.5122,
> nat = 12,
> ntyp = 2,
> ecutwfc = 40 ,
> ecutrho = 400 ,
> /
> &ELECTRONS
>
> /
> &IONS
> ion_dynamics = 'bfgs' ,
> /
> &CELL
> cell_dynamics = 'bfgs' ,
> /
> ATOMIC_SPECIES
> Ti 47.86700 Ti.pw91-sp-van_ak.UPF
> O 15.99940 O.pw91-van_ak.UPF
> ATOMIC_POSITIONS crystal
> Ti 0.000000000 0.000000000 0.000000000
> Ti 0.500000000 0.500000000 0.500000000
> Ti 0.000000000 0.500000000 0.250000000
> Ti 0.500000000 0.000000000 0.750000000
> O 0.000000000 0.500000000 0.042000000
> O 0.000000000 0.000000000 0.208000000
> O 0.500000000 0.500000000 0.292000000
> O 0.000000000 0.500000000 0.458000000
> O 0.500000000 0.000000000 0.542000000
> O 0.500000000 0.500000000 0.708000000
> O 0.000000000 0.000000000 0.792000000
> O 0.500000000 1.000000000 0.958000000
> K_POINTS automatic
> 5 5 2 1 1 1
>
> for rutile case,
>
> &CONTROL
> title = Rutile_lattice ,
> calculation = 'vc-relax' ,
> restart_mode = 'from_scratch' ,
> outdir =
> '/home/vega32/TiO2/rutile/lattice/vcrelax/tmp' ,
> wfcdir = '/tmp/' ,
> pseudo_dir = '/home/vega32/espresso-4.0.1/pseudo/' ,
> prefix = 'Anatase lattice' ,
> disk_io = 'none' ,
> nstep = 1000 ,
> /
> &SYSTEM
> ibrav = 6,
> celldm(1) = 8.6814,
> celldm(3) = 0.6441,
> nat = 6,
> ntyp = 2,
> ecutwfc = 40 ,
> ecutrho = 400 ,
> /
> &ELECTRONS
>
> /
> &IONS
> ion_dynamics = 'bfgs' ,
> /
> &CELL
> cell_dynamics = 'bfgs' ,
> /
> ATOMIC_SPECIES
> O 15.99940 O.pw91-van_ak.UPF
> Ti 47.90000 Ti.pw91-sp-van_ak.UPF
> ATOMIC_POSITIONS crystal
> O 0.304800000 0.304800000 0.000000000
> O 0.695200000 0.695200000 0.000000000
> O 0.195200000 0.804800000 0.500000000
> O 0.804800000 0.195200000 0.500000000
> Ti 0.500000000 0.500000000 0.500000000
> Ti 0.000000000 0.000000000 0.000000000
> K_POINTS automatic
> 4 4 7 1 1 1
>
> vega
>
> ==============================================================
> Vega Lew ( weijia liu)
> PH.D Candidate in Chemical Engineering
> State Key Laboratory of Materials-oriented Chemical Engineering
> College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
> Nanjing University of Technology, 210009, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20080829/5a31d55d/attachment.html>
More information about the users
mailing list