[Pw_forum] The resulte of optimizing the ZnO lattice constant use vc-relax
wangqj1
wangqj1 at 126.com
Tue Aug 19 15:30:19 CEST 2008
Dear pwscf users
I run vc-relax to optimize the lattice constant of ZnO unit cell,my input file and out file as follows:
&CONTROL
title = ZnOVC ,
calculation = 'vc-relax' ,
restart_mode = 'from_scratch' ,
pseudo_dir = '/root/espresso-3.2.3/pseudo/' ,
prefix = ZnO ,
etot_conv_thr = 1.D-5 ,
nstep = 100 ,
tstress = .true. ,
tprnfor = .true. ,
dt = 100 ,
tefield = .false. ,
/
&SYSTEM
ibrav = 4,
celldm(1) = 6.14161,
celldm(3) = 1.6022,
nat = 4,
ntyp = 2,
ecutwfc = 40 ,
ecutrho = 300 ,
nosym = .true. ,
nbnd = 25,
occupations = 'smearing' ,
degauss = 0.002 ,
smearing = 'methfessel-paxton' ,
lda_plus_u = .false. ,
/
&ELECTRONS
conv_thr = 1.D-8 ,
startingpot = 'atomic' ,
startingwfc = 'atomic' ,
mixing_mode = 'plain' ,
mixing_beta = 0.6 ,
diagonalization = 'david' ,
diago_full_acc = .true. ,
/
&IONS
ion_dynamics = 'damp' ,
/
&CELL
cell_dynamics = 'damp-w' ,
/
ATOMIC_SPECIES
Zn 65.00000 Zn.pz-van_ak.UPF
O 16.00000 O.pz-rrkjus.UPF
ATOMIC_POSITIONS crystal
Zn 0.333333333 0.666666667 0.000000000 1 1 1
O 0.333333333 0.666666667 0.381700000 1 1 1
Zn 0.666666667 0.333333333 0.500000000 1 1 1
O 0.666666667 0.333333300 0.881700000 1 1 1
K_POINTS automatic
4 4 4 0 0 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Program PWSCF v.3.2.2 starts ...
Today is 18Aug2008 at 23: 7:36
Ultrasoft (Vanderbilt) Pseudopotentials
Current dimensions of program pwscf are:
ntypx = 10 npk = 40000 lmax = 3
nchix = 6 ndmx = 2000 nbrx = 14 nqfx = 8
Title:
ZnOVC
bravais-lattice index = 4
lattice parameter (a_0) = 6.1416 a.u.
unit-cell volume = 321.4357 (a.u.)^3
number of atoms/cell = 4
number of atomic types = 2
kinetic-energy cutoff = 40.0000 Ry
charge density cutoff = 300.0000 Ry
convergence threshold = 1.0E-08
beta = 0.6000
number of iterations used = 8 plain mixing
Exchange-correlation = SLA PW PBE PBE (1434)
nstep = 100
celldm(1)= 6.141610 celldm(2)= 0.000000 celldm(3)= 1.602200
celldm(4)= 0.000000 celldm(5)= 0.000000 celldm(6)= 0.000000
crystal axes: (cart. coord. in units of a_0)
a(1) = ( 1.000000 0.000000 0.000000 )
a(2) = ( -0.500000 0.866025 0.000000 )
a(3) = ( 0.000000 0.000000 1.602200 )
reciprocal axes: (cart. coord. in units 2 pi/a_0)
b(1) = ( 1.000000 0.577350 0.000000 )
b(2) = ( 0.000000 1.154701 0.000000 )
b(3) = ( 0.000000 0.000000 0.624142 )
.......
.......
outfile:
Final estimate of lattice vectors (input alat units)
1.011331020 0.000000000 0.000000000
-0.505665507 0.875838356 0.000000001
0.000000000 -0.000000002 1.627761723
final unit-cell volume = 334.0064 (a.u.)^3
input alat = 6.1416 (a.u.)
CELL_PARAMETERS (alat)
1.011331020 0.000000000 0.000000000
-0.505665507 0.875838356 0.000000001
0.000000000 -0.000000002 1.627761723
ATOMIC_POSITIONS (crystal)
Zn 0.333333347 0.666666677 0.000438189
O 0.333333356 0.666666677 0.380132292
Zn 0.666666690 0.333333345 0.500438960
O 0.666666695 0.333333331 0.880132483
from the outfile I can see the c/a=1.627761723 and from the final unit-cell volume =334.0064 (a.u.)^3,I can compute the a=6.189678(Bohr)=3.2754(A)。From the value of caculating ,we can see that the c/a and a are both bigger than the experiment , I don't konw whether the result is right or wrong .
Anybody who know about the question and give me the useful advice will be appreciated .
Sincerely
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20080819/6758972c/attachment.html>
More information about the users
mailing list