[Pw_forum] Problem with nbnd in clusters

[Stefano de Gironcoli]

Cyrille Barreteau wrote:
> Stefano,
>
> Let me also mention that the "odd" result gives a
> lower energy than the "reasonable" one.
>   
this is why I thought that nbnd=20 was the correct one...
however I fail to get it in a scalar run .... it is strange.
is this strange behavior robust  w.r.t.  number of processors in your 
case ?
stefano

> cyrille
>
>