[Pw_forum] A question about pp.x and potential output
Peter Winey
peterwiney at gmail.com
Thu May 3 21:45:39 CEST 2007
Dear all,
I was trying to fit/optimize some parameters of an emperical potential using
DFT calculation
results. I got stuck while using the post-processing code.
It is related to "plot_num" of the pp.x input file. In the manual, I found
three values related
to potential:
1=total potential V_bare +V_H+V_xc
2=local ionic potential
11=the V_bare+V_H potential
Now what I want is the "classical electrostatic energy or Coulombic
potential". I searched
the achive of this discussion list a bit and could not find the answer.
I also read the source
code and could not sort it out. I am wondering if it is possible at all to
seperate the Coulombic
contribution from the total potential?
Thanks in advance!
-Peter
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20070503/55e43750/attachment.html>
More information about the users
mailing list