[Pw_forum] discrepancy in molecular binding energy between pwscf and localized basis set program
Axel Kohlmeyer
akohlmey at cmm.chem.upenn.edu
Tue Jun 12 00:55:01 CEST 2007
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007, Garold Murdachaew wrote:
GM> Dear pwscf users,
GM>
GM> I am doing some calculations for relatively weakly interacting species and
GM> decided to compare to what I obtained with localized wavefunction based
GM> programs such as molpro. For example, I did calculations of the binding
GM> energy of Xenon dimer (at the minimum separation of 4.42 Angstroms).
GM> I obtained (in meV):
GM>
GM> molpro pwscf3.2
GM> LDA -34 -34
GM> PBE -4 -11
garold,
one stupid question: how is your basis set convergence
in molpro and more importantly, did you correct for BSSE?
i found that BSSE can be very large for weakly binding
systems, even with large basis sets.
axel.
GM>
GM> As can be seen, the LDA calculations agree perfectly but the PBE pwscf
GM> calculation gives an interaction energy almost three times more negative.
GM> (I realize that for most pwscf users who are usually only concerned about
GM> energies on the eV rather than on the meV scale these differences may seem
GM> insignificant.)
GM>
GM> Here is my PBE pwscf input file for the Xe dimer (the monomer and the LDA
GM> inputs are similar):
GM>
GM> &CONTROL
GM> calculation = 'scf',
GM> prefix = '$HEAD',
GM> title = '$HEAD',
GM> restart_mode = 'from_scratch',
GM> outdir = '$TMPDIR/',
GM> PSEUDO_DIR = '$PSEUDODIR/',
GM> /
GM> &SYSTEM
GM> ibrav = 0,
GM> celldm(1) = 25.d0,
GM> nat = 2,
GM> ntyp = 1,
GM> ecutwfc = 30.0d0,
GM> ecutrho = 300.0d0,
GM> occupations = 'smearing',
GM> degauss = 0.001D0,
GM> smearing = 'mp',
GM> nbnd = 12,
GM> /
GM> &ELECTRONS
GM> conv_thr = 1.0d-8,
GM> mixing_mode = 'plain',
GM> mixing_beta = 0.3d0,
GM> /
GM> ATOMIC_SPECIES
GM> Xe 131.30 Xet2tPBE.RRKJ3
GM> ATOMIC_POSITIONS { angstrom }
GM> Xe .000000000 .000000000 .000000000 0 0 0
GM> Xe .000000000 .000000000 4.420000000 0 0 0
GM> K_POINTS { gamma }
GM> CELL_PARAMETERS { cubic }
GM> 1.00000 0.00000 0.00000
GM> 0.00000 1.00000 0.00000
GM> 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000
GM>
GM> As can be seen, the molecule is in a cubic box of edge length 25 bohr and
GM> thus there is sufficient vacuum to minimize the spurious interactions with
GM> its periodic images. I played with the convergence setting conv_thr but
GM> setting it to a factor of 100 tighter had very small effect. Changing the
GM> degauss setting had no effect on energy (only Fermi level was changed.)
GM> However, when I increased ecutwfc and ecutrho to 70 and 700 respectively,
GM> I obtained a slight change (-10 meV rather than -11 meV). Can somebody
GM> please tell me how I can reproduce my PBE localized basis sets
GM> calculation. Do I need to make some changes to the pseudos? Or is this
GM> what I can expect from gradient-corrected calculations (such as PBE) due
GM> to some sort of errors in estimating the gradients (which are not needed
GM> in the LDA calculation)?
GM>
GM> Thank you for you assistance.
GM>
GM> Best regards,
GM> Garold Murdachaew
GM>
GM> ps: Here are the details of the pseudo I used in pwscf:
GM>
GM> LDA pseudo: XeLDA.RRKJ3.UPF: nonrel, nc, nlcc=t, valence=8, maxl=2
GM> PBE pseudo: Xet2tPBE.RRKJ3 : nonrel, nc, nlcc=t, valence=8, maxl=2
GM>
GM> --
GM> Garold Murdachaew
GM> Postdoctoral Fellow - Condensed Matter Sector
GM> SISSA-ISAS (International School for Advanced Studies)
GM> New Building Room 208
GM> Via Beirut 2-4, 34014 Trieste, Italy
GM>
GM> tel : +39 040 3787 477
GM> fax : +39 040 3787 528
GM> email : murda at sissa.it
GM>
GM>
GM> _______________________________________________
GM> Pw_forum mailing list
GM> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
GM> http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
GM>
--
=======================================================================
Axel Kohlmeyer akohlmey at cmm.chem.upenn.edu http://www.cmm.upenn.edu
Center for Molecular Modeling -- University of Pennsylvania
Department of Chemistry, 231 S.34th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6323
tel: 1-215-898-1582, fax: 1-215-573-6233, office-tel: 1-215-898-5425
=======================================================================
If you make something idiot-proof, the universe creates a better idiot.
More information about the users
mailing list