[Pw_forum] big atomic forces

[Stefano Baroni]

PS: do not forget to attach a signature file with your affiliation  
etc., if you feel like that ...
cheers - S.

On Jun 4, 2007, at 7:24 PM, Jess Kondor wrote:

>
> Hello, everybody,
>
>  I have a question. I relaxed a surface using 8x8x1 k-point mesh  
> and 'm-v' smearing method with degauss=0.01 with criteria for  
> forces 4.d-4 . Then I performed 'scf' calculation with increased  
> number of k-points (12x12x1) and turn on an option 'tprnfor  
> = .true.' in order to calculate forces. Forces are OK (all lower  
> than 4.d-4). But when I perform 'scf' with occupation method  
> 'tetrahedra'  (other parameters are the same), forces on atoms are  
> much higher (some of them are ~2.0d-3). Does it mean that geometry  
> relaxation is not been completed?
>
> cheers,
>    Jess
>

---
Stefano Baroni - SISSA  &  DEMOCRITOS National Simulation Center -  
Trieste
[+39] 040 3787 406 (tel) -528 (fax) / stefanobaroni (skype)

Please, if possible, don't  send me MS Word or PowerPoint attachments
Why? See:  http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20070604/749896d9/attachment.html>