[Pw_forum] Removed pseudopotentials

Miguel Martínez Canales wmbmacam at lg.ehu.es
Tue Feb 20 12:44:53 CET 2007


Dear pwscf users and developers,

I've been browsing the pseudopotential database as of late, and I've 
noticed that Li.pbe-s-van_ak.UPF has been removed due to wrong phonon 
results. There are other very similar pseudopotentials, whose main 
difference, apart from F_xc,  seems to be a slightly different occupation 
(2s0.80 2p0.20 agains 2s0.95 2p0.05). I suspect that, being so similar, 
these pseudopotentials might share the same problem. Have these been tested 
in the same environment than the PBE pseudopotential? If the answer is 
negative, I will test them as long as someone tells me in which condition 
the PBE pseudo failed.

On a similar note, I suspect that Ge.pw91-n-van.UPF may also give wrong 
phonon results (negative frequencies of the fcc phase at ambient pressure), 
but I will send a script in a couple of minutes. I'll of course share my 
results.

Miguel

-- 
----------------------------------------
Miguel Martínez Canales
Dto. Física de la Materia Condensada
UPV/EHU
Facultad de Ciencia y Tecnología
Apdo. 644
48080 Bilbao (Spain)
Fax:  +34 94 601 3500
Tlf:  +34 94 601 5437
----------------------------------------

  "If you have an apple and I have an apple and
  we exchange these apples then you and I will
  still each have one apple. But if you have an
  idea and I have an idea and we exchange these
  ideas, then each of us will have two ideas."

    George Bernard Shaw




More information about the users mailing list