[Pw_forum] Removed pseudopotentials
Miguel Martínez Canales
wmbmacam at lg.ehu.es
Tue Feb 20 12:44:53 CET 2007
Dear pwscf users and developers,
I've been browsing the pseudopotential database as of late, and I've
noticed that Li.pbe-s-van_ak.UPF has been removed due to wrong phonon
results. There are other very similar pseudopotentials, whose main
difference, apart from F_xc, seems to be a slightly different occupation
(2s0.80 2p0.20 agains 2s0.95 2p0.05). I suspect that, being so similar,
these pseudopotentials might share the same problem. Have these been tested
in the same environment than the PBE pseudopotential? If the answer is
negative, I will test them as long as someone tells me in which condition
the PBE pseudo failed.
On a similar note, I suspect that Ge.pw91-n-van.UPF may also give wrong
phonon results (negative frequencies of the fcc phase at ambient pressure),
but I will send a script in a couple of minutes. I'll of course share my
results.
Miguel
--
----------------------------------------
Miguel Martínez Canales
Dto. Física de la Materia Condensada
UPV/EHU
Facultad de Ciencia y Tecnología
Apdo. 644
48080 Bilbao (Spain)
Fax: +34 94 601 3500
Tlf: +34 94 601 5437
----------------------------------------
"If you have an apple and I have an apple and
we exchange these apples then you and I will
still each have one apple. But if you have an
idea and I have an idea and we exchange these
ideas, then each of us will have two ideas."
George Bernard Shaw
More information about the users
mailing list