[Pw_forum] Erroneous CPU Time Report
Paul M. Grant
w2agz at pacbell.net
Wed Feb 7 03:22:12 CET 2007
Lorenzo, I've pasted below the info you requested.
BTW, I'm new to the forum, and hope this is the way to respond (add) to a
thread.
More info. I recompiled Espresso using the latest Intel compiler and still
zero or small cpu times are reported. I suspect this behavior may involve
the fact that I have a dual processor MB. Also, from the recent post by
Paolo Giannozzi, I gather my situation emerges rather often!
-Paul
PWSCF : 0.00s CPU time, 48.80s wall time
init_run : 0.00s CPU
electrons : 0.00s CPU
electrons : 0.00s CPU
c_bands : 0.00s CPU ( 31 calls, 0.000 s avg)
sum_band : 0.00s CPU ( 31 calls, 0.000 s avg)
v_of_rho : 0.00s CPU ( 31 calls, 0.000 s avg)
v_h : 0.00s CPU ( 31 calls, 0.000 s avg)
v_xc : 0.00s CPU ( 31 calls, 0.000 s avg)
newd : 0.00s CPU ( 31 calls, 0.000 s avg)
mix_rho : 0.00s CPU ( 31 calls, 0.000 s avg)
c_bands : 0.00s CPU ( 31 calls, 0.000 s avg)
init_us_2 : 0.00s CPU ( 63 calls, 0.000 s avg)
cegterg : 0.00s CPU ( 31 calls, 0.000 s avg)
sum_band : 0.00s CPU ( 31 calls, 0.000 s avg)
becsum : 0.00s CPU ( 31 calls, 0.000 s avg)
addusdens : 0.00s CPU ( 31 calls, 0.000 s avg)
cegterg : 0.00s CPU ( 31 calls, 0.000 s avg)
h_psi : 0.00s CPU ( 112 calls, 0.000 s avg)
g_psi : 0.00s CPU ( 80 calls, 0.000 s avg)
diaghg : 0.00s CPU ( 110 calls, 0.000 s avg)
update : 0.00s CPU ( 80 calls, 0.000 s avg)
last : 0.00s CPU ( 31 calls, 0.000 s avg)
h_psi : 0.00s CPU ( 112 calls, 0.000 s avg)
init : 0.00s CPU ( 112 calls, 0.000 s avg)
add_vuspsi : 0.00s CPU ( 112 calls, 0.000 s avg)
s_psi : 0.00s CPU ( 112 calls, 0.000 s avg)
General routines
ccalbec : 0.00s CPU ( 31 calls, 0.000 s avg)
cft3 : 0.00s CPU ( 373 calls, 0.000 s avg)
cft3s : 0.00s CPU ( 1858 calls, 0.000 s avg)
davcio : 0.00s CPU ( 31 calls, 0.000 s avg)
-----Original Message-----
From: pw_forum-admin at pwscf.org [mailto:pw_forum-admin at pwscf.org] On Behalf
Of Lorenzo Paulatto
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 12:23 AM
To: pw_forum at pwscf.org
Subject: Re: [Pw_forum] Erroneous CPU Time Report
> While running the complete set of Espresso 3.2 PWscf examples
> (successfully), I noted that the elapsed CPU time reported is either zero
> or
> some unrealistically small value such as 0.02s. The "wall time" is fine.
> My motherboard is a dual Xeon processor Supermicro, OS is SuSE 10.1, and
> fortran compiler G95. Any suggestions? Thanks.
>
Could you post an example of the time part of your output, like this one:
PWSCF : 1m45.98s CPU time
init_run : 5.84s CPU
electrons : 99.58s CPU
forces : 0.50s CPU
electrons : 99.58s CPU
c_bands : 84.10s CPU ( 5 calls, 16.819 s avg)
sum_band : 15.35s CPU ( 5 calls, 3.070 s avg)
v_of_rho : 0.08s CPU ( 5 calls, 0.015 s avg)
mix_rho : 0.01s CPU ( 5 calls, 0.002 s avg)
c_bands : 84.10s CPU ( 5 calls, 16.819 s avg)
init_us_2 : 0.77s CPU ( 720 calls, 0.001 s avg)
cegterg : 83.09s CPU ( 300 calls, 0.277 s avg)
sum_band : 15.35s CPU ( 5 calls, 3.070 s avg)
wfcrot : 5.31s CPU ( 60 calls, 0.089 s avg)
cegterg : 83.09s CPU ( 300 calls, 0.277 s avg)
h_psi : 70.91s CPU ( 1269 calls, 0.056 s avg)
g_psi : 0.30s CPU ( 909 calls, 0.000 s avg)
overlap : 4.58s CPU ( 909 calls, 0.005 s avg)
cdiaghg : 2.60s CPU ( 1209 calls, 0.002 s avg)
update : 3.80s CPU ( 909 calls, 0.004 s avg)
last : 2.45s CPU ( 360 calls, 0.007 s avg)
h_psi : 70.91s CPU ( 1269 calls, 0.056 s avg)
init : 0.61s CPU ( 1269 calls, 0.000 s avg)
firstfft : 30.13s CPU ( 13485 calls, 0.002 s avg)
secondfft : 27.76s CPU ( 13485 calls, 0.002 s avg)
add_vuspsi : 0.94s CPU ( 1269 calls, 0.001 s avg)
General routines
ccalbec : 1.43s CPU ( 1329 calls, 0.001 s avg)
cft3 : 0.08s CPU ( 23 calls, 0.003 s avg)
cft3s : 59.82s CPU ( 31770 calls, 0.002 s avg)
davcio : 0.86s CPU ( 1020 calls, 0.001 s avg)
thanks, LP
----------------------------------------------------------------
SISSA Webmail https://webmail.sissa.it/
Powered by SquirrelMail http://www.squirrelmail.org/
_______________________________________________
Pw_forum mailing list
Pw_forum at pwscf.org
http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
More information about the users
mailing list