[Pw_forum] Strange phonon branches appear in phonon dispersion

Viet Bac vietbacchemist at gmail.com
Thu Dec 13 07:04:16 CET 2007


>
> Dear Dr. Stefano and Dr. Mohr,


Thank you for your  comments,

Actually I had successfully  done  phonon dispersion and  EPC  for Al bulk
structure with  good  results so from now I want to apply for the Al wires
structures. Firstly I calculate for 2 atom cell of Al with zigzag wires, and
I got 6 phonon modes along q-points and appear some negative frequencies, so
I tried to improve my calculation but always appear negative acoustic
frequencies (optical branch is no problem) and then I did with 4, 6 atom
cell and of course I got 3-n modes but my results still no good like I
expect. :(
To check my set up parameters I calculate the same procedure for Al 1D
linear chain with 1 and 2 atom cell with hopefully the phonon curves will be
the same as I studied theoretically in Solid States books, but it was not
:(. So should my calculation be wrong with this system. Could you give me
advice about my input parameters? Please keep your eyes my INPUT files (in
case of 2 atoms in zigzag chain)

Al.scf.fit.in

 &SYSTEM
                       ibrav = 6,
                 celldm(1) = 39.994,
                   celldm(3) =  0.199762906,
                         nat = 2,
                        ntyp = 1,
                     ecutwfc = 25.D0 ,
                     ecutrho = 300,
                 occupations = 'smearing' ,
                     degauss = 0.05 ,
                    smearing = 'methfessel-paxton' ,
                      la2F = .true.
 /
 &ELECTRONS
                    conv_thr = 1.D-10 ,
                 mixing_beta = 0.7D0 ,
 /
ATOMIC_SPECIES
   Al   26.98000  Al.vbc.UPF
ATOMIC_POSITIONS angstrom
Al       0.000000000   1.517315647   2.138739361
Al       0.000000000   0.116702849   0.023699809
K_POINTS automatic
  4 4 40   0 0 0

Al.scf.in

 &SYSTEM
                       ibrav = 6,
                 celldm(1) = 39.994,
                   celldm(3) =  0.199762906,
                         nat = 2,
                        ntyp = 1,
                     ecutwfc = 25.D0 ,
                     ecutrho = 300,
                 occupations = 'smearing' ,
                     degauss = 0.05 ,
                    smearing = 'methfessel-paxton'
 /
 &ELECTRONS
                    conv_thr = 1.D-10 ,
                 mixing_beta = 0.7D0 ,
 /
ATOMIC_SPECIES
   Al   26.98000  Al.vbc.UPF
ATOMIC_POSITIONS angstrom
Al       0.000000000   1.517315647   2.138739361
Al       0.000000000   0.116702849   0.023699809
K_POINTS automatic
  2 2 20   0 0 0

Al.elph.in

Electron-phonon coefficients for Alwire_2
 &inputph
  tr2_ph=1.0d-14,
  prefix='al2_elph',
  fildvscf='al2d',
  filelph='matrix'
  amass(1)=26.98,
  outdir='/root/tmp/',
  fildyn='al2m.dyn',
  elph=.true.,
  trans=.true.,
  ldisp=.true.
  nq1=1, nq2=1, nq3=10,

And hereafter 6 modes I got

 &plot nbnd=   6, nks=  27 /
            0.000000  0.000000  0.000000
   -0.0855   -0.0450    0.0000   20.7938  196.2309  372.4942
            0.000000  0.000000  0.100000
  -13.1432    5.6657    5.7114   20.3098  196.7060  372.0899
            0.000000  0.000000  0.200000
  -25.6753   10.2550   10.5805   18.8468  198.1533  371.0008
            0.000000  0.000000  0.300000
  -37.6999   14.0728   14.1858   16.2544  200.5950  369.4869
            0.000000  0.000000  0.400000
  -48.8295   11.6034   16.4265   16.4576  203.9728  367.7201
            0.000000  0.000000  0.500000
  -58.7192   -5.6944   16.7453   17.6129  208.1190  365.6663
            0.000000  0.000000  0.600000
  -67.0895  -15.3952   14.9673   18.4203  212.8051  363.1793
            0.000000  0.000000  0.700000
  -73.7443  -21.7038   11.9605   19.3942  217.8126  360.1938
            0.000000  0.000000  0.800000
  -78.6120  -26.9948    9.8326   20.4642  222.9635  356.8134
            0.000000  0.000000  0.900000
  -81.7857  -31.7595   10.1665   21.2176  228.1041  353.2106
            0.000000  0.000000  1.000000
  -83.4878  -36.1149   10.5785   21.4924  233.0809  349.4591
            0.000000  0.000000  1.100000
  -83.9637  -39.9380    6.4409   21.5912  237.7521  345.4939
            0.000000  0.000000  1.200000
  -83.3549  -43.0700  -11.8614   21.8643  242.0400  341.2345
            0.000000  0.000000  1.300000
  -81.7148  -45.5109  -19.5363   22.1233  245.9755  336.7214
            0.000000  0.000000  1.400000
  -79.2450  -47.4002  -24.2602   21.7049  249.6731  332.1110
            0.000000  0.000000  1.500000
  -76.4698  -48.7989  -26.8527   20.1426  253.2412  327.5276
            0.000000  0.000000  1.600000
  -74.0708  -49.5494  -28.8342   17.6459  256.7020  322.9460
            0.000000  0.000000  1.700000
  -72.4259  -49.4368  -31.6947   14.8469  259.9856  318.2672
            0.000000  0.000000  1.800000
  -71.2114  -48.4948  -35.6608   11.6256  263.0044  313.5063
            0.000000  0.000000  1.900000
  -69.6799  -47.0750  -39.7963    4.2536  265.7429  308.8670
            0.000000  0.000000  2.000000
  -67.4586  -45.5010  -43.2503  -12.7026  268.2849  304.5960
            0.000000  0.000000  2.100000
  -64.9647  -46.1360  -43.6300  -19.3793  270.7903  300.7406
            0.000000  0.000000  2.200000
  -63.0506  -49.2247  -40.9136  -23.4729  273.4711  297.0578
            0.000000  0.000000  2.300000
  -62.1609  -52.8376  -37.0315  -25.3558  276.5514  293.2015
            0.000000  0.000000  2.400000
  -61.8563  -56.2311  -32.5370  -26.2996  280.1674  289.0264
            0.000000  0.000000  2.500000
  -61.6387  -57.8617  -29.3445  -27.6304  283.8161  285.1565
            0.000000  0.000000  2.503000
  -61.6384  -57.8633  -29.3391  -27.6341  283.8284  285.1440


   Bac,

------------------------------
Phung Viet Bac
Division of Mathematical and Physical Science,
Graduate School of Natural Science and Technology,
Kanazawa University,
Kakuma, Kanazawa 920-1192, JAPAN








>
> your phonon branches are really strange...
> with two atoms I would expect 6 modes per each q-point
>
> stefano
>
>
>
> 6 branches for 2 atom are what one expects (in general 3n branches and 3
> acoustical and 3n-3 optical ones).
>
> However negative values indicate some error in your calculation, dependent
> on the magnitude and system.
> You can impose some sum-rules for the acoustic ones, to force them to be
> 0 at the Gamma point.
>
> Acoustic forces are harder to calculate (smaller forces). In your case I
> would guess up to 15 cm^1 should be ok for the acoustic ones.
> Negative optical ones should not occur.
>
> Best
> Marcel Mohr
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20071213/90dfc706/attachment.html>


More information about the users mailing list