[Pw_forum] a complex and old question about why the erengy is down when i enlarge one of the crystal lattice
xu yuehua
njuxuyuehua at gmail.com
Mon Dec 3 09:20:18 CET 2007
hi everyone:
my question is somewhat old ,i have seen a lot of related discussion in this
forum .but my results does not like previous instance.
i only want to relax c of crystal lattice ,and fixed c,computes it,and then
change it ,compute it,and .....
i get the E VS C tabular
so strange is that :
c E
2.655 -137.78747
2.725 -137.7912
2.76 -137.79219
2.77 -137.79233
2.78 -137.79248
2.795 -137.79266
2.8 -137.7927
2.81 -137.79275
2.82 -137.79275
2.83 -137.79278
2.84 -137.79276
2.85 -137.79279
(1)the energy is down before 2,81,and c=2.83 is like local minimum
,and then the energy is go on to down. the graph is smooth ,but i can not
get the parabola shape .so the best relaxed structure is unkown to me.
and i saw many discuss about the down energy ,maybe the ecutrho
issue. but i am not sure .if ti is ,i should test the ecutrho?i post my
input file here:
&CONTROL
calculation = "relax",
prefix = "xyh",
pseudo_dir = "/home/xyh/intel_espresso-3.2/pseudo",
outdir = "/raid/xyh/pwscf/tmp/",
etot_conv_thr=1.D-5
forc_conv_thr=1.D-4
nstep=50
tstress=.TRUE.
/
&SYSTEM
ibrav = 4,
a=20,b=20,c=2.7950,cosab=-0.5,cosac=0,cosbc=0,
nat = 12,
ntyp = 2,
ecutwfc =29.9876 ,
ecutrho =200
/
&ELECTRONS
conv_thr = 1.D-9,
mixing_beta = 0.2D0,
/
&IONS
pot_extrapolation = "second_order",
wfc_extrapolation = "second_order",
/
ATOMIC_SPECIES
H 1.0 H.pbe-van_bm.UPF
O 15.999 O.pbe-van_bm.UPF
ATOMIC_POSITIONS { crystal }
H 0.0373836515057430 0.9503896146857272 0.0102606085503574
H 0.1115317646909714 0.9930799089192295 0.3344160938275307
H 0.0789318950169224 0.0718359337861800 0.9884868039481935
H 0.0724243415282819 0.1328116898677112 0.6645236821235255
H 0.9626484865634389 0.0496365043168296 0.0101367101334339
H 0.8884876867936907 0.0069387333102180 0.3342097796899214
H 0.9210924986163674 0.9281832378776828 0.9882981504770443
H 0.9276176392628244 0.8672101853812219 0.6643346513014633
O 0.0926597580972745 0.9929556282114975
......
..
(2)and another question is although i can not get the lowest erengy,but i
can get the parabola of the stress. maybe someone the stress is not
consistent with energy,for i only want to know which structure is best
,so the exactly stress is not so import for me, i only want to know the
trend .in this point,whether i can rely on the stress to determine the best
structure.
i need your help.
thanks
--
Xu Yuehua
physics Department of Nanjing university
China
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20071203/e05ef342/attachment.html>
More information about the users
mailing list