[Pw_forum] vc-relax
Eric Abel
etabel at hotmail.com
Mon Sep 11 08:41:02 CEST 2006
Cesar,
Thank you for your response. Unfortunately if it were that simple, I
wouldn't have had the need to post to the forum.
my output file contains a series of scf calculations, which is to be
expected, after each scf convergence it lists the atomic forces followed by
the stress:
total energy = -357.37450532 ryd
estimated scf accuracy < 2.2E-11 ryd
convergence has been achieved
Forces acting on atoms (Ry/au):
atom 1 type 1 force = 0.00000000 0.00000000 0.00682942
atom 2 type 1 force = 0.00000000 0.00000000 -0.00682942
atom 3 type 2 force = 0.00000000 0.00000000 0.20546159
atom 4 type 2 force = 0.00000000 0.00000000 -0.20546159
atom 5 type 3 force = 0.00000000 0.00000000 -0.08327844
atom 6 type 3 force = 0.00000000 0.00000000 0.08327844
entering subroutine stress ...
total stress (ryd/bohr**3) (kbar) P=
-82.53
-0.00135974 0.00000000 0.00000000 -200.02 0.00 0.00
0.00000000 -0.00071001 0.00000000 0.00 -104.45 0.00
0.00000000 0.00000000 0.00038671 0.00 0.00 56.89
after the last iteration, it lists a set of k-points followed by:
Writing file tiocl.save for program phonon
PWSCF : 13h57m CPU time
init_run : 66.55s CPU
electrons : 44803.10s CPU ( 50 calls, 896.062 s avg)
forces : 1319.61s CPU ( 50 calls, 26.392 s avg)
stress : 2795.36s CPU ( 50 calls, 55.907 s avg)
electrons : 44803.10s CPU ( 50 calls, 896.062 s avg)
c_bands : 37432.39s CPU ( 343 calls, 109.132 s avg)
sum_band : 6668.94s CPU ( 343 calls, 19.443 s avg)
v_of_rho : 70.93s CPU ( 688 calls, 0.103 s avg)
newd : 669.21s CPU ( 345 calls, 1.940 s avg)
mix_rho : 48.63s CPU ( 343 calls, 0.142 s avg)
c_bands : 37432.39s CPU ( 343 calls, 109.132 s avg)
init_us_2 : 514.48s CPU ( 59025 calls, 0.009 s avg)
cegterg : 36838.34s CPU ( 25725 calls, 1.432 s avg)
sum_band : 6668.94s CPU ( 343 calls, 19.443 s avg)
becsum : 5.02s CPU ( 25725 calls, 0.000 s avg)
addusdens : 625.36s CPU ( 343 calls, 1.823 s avg)
wfcrot : 44.03s CPU ( 75 calls, 0.587 s avg)
cegterg : 36838.34s CPU ( 25725 calls, 1.432 s avg)
h_psi : 24259.17s CPU ( 85747 calls, 0.283 s avg)
g_psi : 203.06s CPU ( 59947 calls, 0.003 s avg)
overlap : 3791.19s CPU ( 59947 calls, 0.063 s avg)
cdiaghg : 1084.00s CPU ( 60022 calls, 0.018 s avg)
update : 1402.85s CPU ( 59947 calls, 0.023 s avg)
last : 1466.98s CPU ( 26082 calls, 0.056 s avg)
h_psi : 24259.17s CPU ( 85747 calls, 0.283 s avg)
init : 96.39s CPU ( 85747 calls, 0.001 s avg)
firstfft : 8568.69s CPU ( 1932983 calls, 0.004 s avg)
secondfft : 8659.88s CPU ( 1932983 calls, 0.004 s avg)
add_vuspsi : 2826.23s CPU ( 85747 calls, 0.033 s avg)
s_psi : 2548.22s CPU ( 85747 calls, 0.030 s avg)
General routines
ccalbec : 4178.90s CPU ( 118972 calls, 0.035 s avg)
cft3 : 128.72s CPU ( 4378 calls, 0.029 s avg)
cft3s : 18657.11s CPU ( 4638404 calls, 0.004 s avg)
interpolate : 33.71s CPU ( 688 calls, 0.049 s avg)
davcio : 147.96s CPU ( 84750 calls, 0.002 s avg)
There are a few additional lines, but I don't find the words CELL_PARAMETERS
or ATOMIC_POSITIONS anywhere. My instinct tells me that perhaps something
went wrong, but the program completed without complaint. I never set the
verbosity level, so I assume it's set at the default. Like I said in my
original post, in the 'relax' calculation, the relevant information was
present.
Any ideas from anyone?
Eric
>From: cesards at msi.umn.edu
>Reply-To: pw_forum at pwscf.org
>To: pw_forum at pwscf.org
>Subject: Re:[Pw_forum] vc-relax
>Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 18:11:12 -0500 (CDT)
>
>Hi Eric,
>
>
>with verbosity = 'default' pwscf will report new cell vectors in
>units of a_0, and atomic positions relative to the new cell vector at the
>end of standard output, just before the cpu time breakdow report.
>
>Search for the keywords CELL_PARAMETERS and ATOMIC_POSITIONS.
>
>
>Cesar R.S. da Silva.
>
>_______________________________________________
>Pw_forum mailing list
>Pw_forum at pwscf.org
>http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
More information about the users
mailing list