[Pw_forum] bfgs and trust radius
Vivek Ranjan
vranjan at ncsu.edu
Tue Oct 24 23:58:33 CEST 2006
Hi !
I getting the following message :
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
number of scf cycles = 14
number of bfgs steps = 1
energy old = -1402.7124539122 ryd
energy new = -1402.7077099529 ryd
CASE: energy_new > energy_old
new trust radius = 0.0000480606 bohr
trust_radius < trust_radius_min
resetting bfgs history
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
from bfgs : error # 1
bfgs history already reset at previous step
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
stopping ...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Based on earlier discussions I feel the following are important
parameters, which I have set as :
etot_conv_thr = 1.0d-4
forc_conv_thr = 1.0d-5
&system
ibrav= 0,
nat= 31,
ntyp= 6,
celldm(1) = 7.2225240402,
ecutwfc = 35.0,
ecutrho = 420.0
occupations='smearing', smearing='mv', degauss=0.05
nosym=.true.
/
&electrons
mixing_mode = 'plain'
mixing_beta = 0.5
conv_thr = 1.0d-8
diagonalization = 'david' ,
/
&ions
upscale=100
/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have faced the above problem several times. But changing one thing or
the another may result in convergence. The above generally happens when
the system is already close to convergence.
I would like to know if it is a good idea to reduce the trust_radius_min
below its present default value set in pwscf ?
Thank you,
Vivek
More information about the users
mailing list