[Pw_forum] Re: Different Gamma factors for Q-points in the same star
Eyvaz Isaev
eyvaz_isaev at yahoo.com
Tue May 30 01:21:34 CEST 2006
Dear Stefano,
I am quite agree with your comment, but I suggested
(and hopefully it is) that the symmetrization is done
correctly in the code. As you know the gamma
approximately is a sum of production of two delta
functions, connecting two parts of the Fermi surface,
and is believed to converge slowly wrt number of
k-sampling. That is why I suggested the use of more
k-points.
Bests,
Eyvaz.
--- Stefano Baroni <baroni at sissa.it> wrote:
> Andrea, Eyvaz: I know nothing about the way the
> Eliashberg function
> is calculated in Quantum ESPRESSO, but symmetry
> issues have (should have) little (if anything) to
do > with k-point grids, cutoff, and the like. What
I
> mean is that if symmetrization is well implemented
> (and well understood by those who use the code) an
> inadequate cutoff and/ or k-point grid may well
give > inaccurate results, but these results
> should be the same (to _very_ high accuracy) whether
> calculated by restricting the BZ sampling to the
> irreducible wedge (and properly
> symmetrizing the result), or by the extending the
> sum to the full BZ.
> Sorry for not being more helpful than this - Stefano
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
More information about the users
mailing list