[Pw_forum] BFGS convergence
Paolo Giannozzi
giannozz at nest.sns.it
Tue Aug 29 12:21:20 CEST 2006
On Monday 28 August 2006 05:21, PRASENJIT GHOSH wrote:
> I'm keeping the bottom 2 layers fixed & relaxing rest of the layers along
> all directions. I have set forc_conv_thr as 5.0D-4. When the BFGS
> optimization is complete the total force printed out is 0.001184 Ry/au.,
> which is higher than the threshold.
this is not the quantity that is checked for convergence, though:
---
forc_conv_thr REAL ( default = 1.0D-3 )
convergence threshold on forces (a.u) for ionic
minimization: the convergence criterion is satisfied
when all components of all forces are smaller than
forc_conv_thr.
---
> My question is when the code calculates the force (grad) & their
> differencec between 2 consecutive BFGS iter. (grad_error) & is it only for
> the atoms which are allowed to relax or for the full system or something
> is going wrong in the calculation? I'm using version 3.0.
forces on atoms that are kept fixed are not considered in
the convergence criterion, or else you will never achieve
convergence in presence of a constraint
Paolo
--
Paolo Giannozzi Phone: +39/050-509876
DEMOCRITOS and SNS Fax: +39/050-563513
Piazza dei Cavalieri 7 I-56126 Pisa, Italy
More information about the users
mailing list