[Pw_forum] 答复: [Pw_forum] why I can not get the correct band gap of TiO2?
#TAO JUNGUANG#
TAOJ0003 at ntu.edu.sg
Wed Oct 26 18:03:22 CEST 2005
Dear Ballabio,
Thanks a lot!!
Based on your suggestion, I make an another run and get a reasonable results. However, why in the valance band , there has a huge gap?( see the values -48.0314 and -24.6221) ,and can you tell how to use bands.x and forthmore band_plot.x to plot the band structure? Thanks
Regards
Tao Junguang
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: pw_forum-admin at pwscf.org [mailto:pw_forum-admin at pwscf.org] 代表 Gerardo Ballabio
发送时间: 2005年10月26日 23:20
收件人: pw_forum at pwscf.org
主题: Re: [Pw_forum] why I can not get the correct band gap of TiO2?
On 10/26/2005 04:19:07 PM, #TAO JUNGUANG# wrote:
> End of band structure calculation
> k = 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 band energies (ev):
> -48.0496 -48.0314 -24.6221 -24.6221 -24.5729 -24.5342 -24.4355
> -24.4355
> -10.8942 -9.9348 -9.1108 -9.1108 1.4602 1.7866 2.9518
> 3.3254
> 3.3254 4.5197 4.5197 4.9432 5.9659 6.2973 6.2973
> 6.9316
> from the output file, I think the band gap is
> (1.4602-(-9.1108)=10.571eV),first, am I right getting band gap like
> this?
No.
You aren't getting any band gap unless you calculate at least one
empty band. In your input "nbnd" isn't specified, thus the default
number of bands is computed -- that is, only occupied ones.
Indeed, O has 6 valence electrons, Ti has 12 (assuming that semicore
3s and 3p are included). You have 4 O + 2 Ti = 48 electrons in your
cell, at 2 electrons per band, this makes exactly 24 bands.
You must specify an "nbnd" of at least 25.
Gerardo
_______________________________________________
Pw_forum mailing list
Pw_forum at pwscf.org
http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
More information about the users
mailing list