[Pw_forum] Electron-Phonon: Two questions
Miguel Martínez Canales
wmbmacam at lg.ehu.es
Wed Oct 5 11:24:27 CEST 2005
Dear Dr. Gianozzi,
Maybe this has something to do with the other el-ph thread. Anyway, with the
test job I'm providing, I get the following nscf output. Am I using a kpoint
grid that is too large?
Job:
[...]
# self-consistent calculation
cat > al.scf.in << EOF
&control
calculation='scf'
restart_mode='from_scratch',
tstress = .true.
tprnfor = .true.
prefix='al',
pseudo_dir = '$PSEUDO_DIR/',
outdir='$TMP_DIR/'
/
&system
ibrav= 2, celldm(1) =7.603, nat= 1, ntyp= 1,
ecutwfc =40.0,
occupations='smearing', smearing='gauss', degauss=0.04
/
&electrons
conv_thr = 1.0d-8
mixing_beta = 0.7
/
ATOMIC_SPECIES
Al 26.9815 Al.pbe-n-van.UPF
ATOMIC_POSITIONS
Al 0.00 0.00 0.00
K_POINTS {automatic}
32 32 32 1 1 1
EOF
$ECHO " running the scf calculation...\c"
$PW_COMMAND < al.scf.in > al.scf.out
$ECHO " done"
cat > al.nscf.in << EOF
&control
calculation='phonon'
restart_mode='from_scratch',
prefix='al',
pseudo_dir = '$PSEUDO_DIR/',
outdir='$TMP_DIR/'
/
&system
ibrav= 2, celldm(1) =7.603, nat= 1, ntyp= 1,
ecutwfc =40.0,
occupations='smearing', smearing='gauss', degauss=0.04
/
&electrons
conv_thr = 1.0d-8
/
&phonon
xqq(1) = -0.125, xqq(2) = -0.125, xqq(3) = -0.125
/
ATOMIC_SPECIES
Al 26.9815 Al.pbe-n-van.UPF
ATOMIC_POSITIONS
Al 0.00 0.00 0.00
K_POINTS {automatic}
32 32 32 1 1 1
EOF
$ECHO " running the nscf calculation at q=$qpoint...\c"
$PW_COMMAND < al.nscf.in >> al.nscf.out
$ECHO " done"
[...]
It follows with a ph.x input file with elph.and.trans=.true. I won't submit
this, as the error I get is in the nscf run. I was using just 2gb of ram. The
nscf output is:
Program PWSCF v.2.1.5 starts ...
Today is 5Oct2005 at 3:31:22
Parallel version (MPI)
Number of processors in use: 2
R & G space division: nprocp = 2
Ultrasoft (Vanderbilt) Pseudopotentials
Current dimensions of program pwscf are:
ntypx =10 npk =40000 lmax = 3
nchix = 6 ndmx = 2000 nbrx =14 nqfx = 8
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
from set_kplusq : error # 22880
too many k points
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
stopping ...
Thanks again,
Miguel
Paolo Giannozzi wrote:
> On Thursday 22 September 2005 16:34, Miguel Martínez Canales wrote:
>
>
>>- One of the calculations, although it yields results, gives me the
>>following error message:
>>
>> task # 0
>> from set_kplusq : error # 0
>> too many k points
>>
>>should I be worried?
>
>
> maybe: it is a very weird error. Could you please provide a test job?
>
>
>>- On the second non-selfconsistent run, with a dense grid [..]
>>sometimes kpoint counting surpasses k(9999) and k(****) follows.
>>Is this the source of the previous error ?
>
>
> most likely, no
>
> Paolo
>
--
----------------------------------------
Miguel Martínez Canales
Dto. Física de la Materia Condensada
UPV/EHU
Facultad de Ciencia y Tecnología
Apdo. 644
48080 Bilbao (Spain)
Fax: +34 94 601 3500
Tlf: +34 94 601 5437
----------------------------------------
2005 International Year of Physics
More information about the users
mailing list