[Pw_forum] Why there difference between my results and those
张 洪彬
leoant21 at hotmail.com
Wed Mar 30 03:52:15 CEST 2005
Thank you for your kind help.
In the output files(scf.out and band.out) I found something like below,
which is alike those in the output files of si in example05.
In scf out file:
Cartesian axes
site n. atom positions (a_0 units)
1 Mg tau( 1) = ( 0.0000000 0.0000000 0.0000000
)
2 B tau( 2) = ( 0.5000000 0.2886800 0.5705000
)
3 B tau( 3) = ( 0.0000000 0.5773500 0.5705000
)
number of k points= 3600 (tetrahedron method)
cart. coord. in units 2pi/a_0
k( 1) = ( 0.0166667 0.0288675 0.0146071), wk = 0.0002963
k( 2) = ( 0.0166667 0.0288675 0.0438212), wk = 0.0002963
k( 3) = ( 0.0166667 0.0288675 0.0730353), wk = 0.0002963
In band.out
crystal axes: (cart. coord. in units of a_0)
a(1) = ( 1.000000 0.000000 0.000000 )
a(2) = ( -0.500000 0.866025 0.000000 )
a(3) = ( 0.000000 0.000000 1.141000 )
reciprocal axes: (cart. coord. in units 2 pi/a_0)
b(1) = ( 1.000000 0.577350 0.000000 )
b(2) = ( 0.000000 1.154701 0.000000 )
b(3) = ( 0.000000 0.000000 0.876424 )
..........
Cartesian axes
site n. atom positions (a_0 units)
1 Mg tau( 1) = ( 0.0000000 0.0000000 0.0000000
)
2 B tau( 2) = ( 0.5000000 0.2886800 0.5705000
)
3 B tau( 3) = ( 0.0000000 0.5773500 0.5705000
)
number of k points= 283 gaussian broad. (ryd)= 0.0100 ngauss =
0
cart. coord. in units 2pi/a_0
k( 1) = ( 0.0000000 0.0000000 0.0000000), wk = 0.0070671
k( 2) = ( 0.0000000 0.0100000 0.0000000), wk = 0.0070671
k( 3) = ( 0.0000000 0.0200000 0.0000000), wk = 0.0070671
Isn't these k-points in cartesian? And how can one adjust k-points to fit
in different coordination?
Regards
Hongbin Zhang
_________________________________________________________________
享用世界上最大的电子邮件系统― MSN Hotmail。 http://www.hotmail.com
More information about the users
mailing list