[Pw_forum] about phonon calculation
Eyvaz Isaev
eyvaz_isaev at yahoo.com
Wed Jul 6 18:51:30 CEST 2005
Hi,
In order to get correct LO mode you should calculate
phonons using dynmat.x from /pwtools directory.
Effective charges for B and N are not equal due to
numerical errors in our computer calculations.
Bests,
Eyvaz.
--- sun jason <jasonsun98 at hotmail.com> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I executed a test of phonon calculation of cubic BN,
> the input for scf is
> like this
>
===========================================================================
> &SYSTEM
> ibrav = 2,
> celldm(1)= 6.792,
> nat = 2,
> ntyp = 2,
> ecutwfc = 50.0 ,
> /
> &ELECTRONS
> conv_thr = 1.0d-9 ,
> mixing_beta = 0.7 ,
> /
> ATOMIC_SPECIES
> B 10.81100 B.pz-vbc.UPF
> N 14.00674 N.pz-vbc.UPF
> ATOMIC_POSITIONS
> B 0.000000000 0.000000000 0.000000000
>
> N 0.250000000 0.250000000 0.250000000
>
> K_POINTS automatic
> 6 6 6 1 1 1
>
===========================================================================
>
> and the result of dielectric tensor and effective
> charge is like this:
>
>
===========================================================================
> Dielectric constant in cartesian axis
>
> ( 4.637335813 0.000000000
> 0.000000000 )
> ( 0.000000000 4.637335813
> 0.000000000 )
> ( 0.000000000 0.000000000
> 4.637335813 )
>
> Effective charges E-U in cartesian axis
>
> atom 1
> ( 1.85986 0.00000
> 0.00000 )
> ( 0.00000 1.85986
> 0.00000 )
> ( 0.00000 0.00000
> 1.85986 )
> atom 2
> ( -1.82935 0.00000
> 0.00000 )
> ( 0.00000 -1.82935
> 0.00000 )
> ( 0.00000 0.00000
> -1.82935 )
>
>
===========================================================================
> and the frequency at gamma point is like this:
>
===========================================================================
> 0.0000 0.0001 0.0001 1055.5528 1055.5528
> 1274.3693
>
===========================================================================
>
> so my question is:
>
> 1)why the LO mode is so small(the exact value is
> about 1305 cm-1) when the
> TO mode is correct? and how to improve it?
>
> 2) why the absolute value of effective charge for B
> atom and N atom is not
> equal?
>
> any help would be appreciate much!
>
>
> jason
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>
____________________________________________________
Sell on Yahoo! Auctions no fees. Bid on great items.
http://auctions.yahoo.com/
More information about the users
mailing list