[Pw_forum] LAM 7.1.1 and PW2.1.2

[Matteo Cococcioni]

Dear all,

I have to apologize again. In the message below I said that LAM 7.2.1 has been
released but it's not true. I got confused.

So Lam 7.0.6 with ifort 8.1 work well with PW 2.1.2. I'm not sure whether the
latest 8.1 compiler can work with lam 7.1.1; I haven't tried.

That's all I know. Sorry again for the confusion.

Matteo


Quoting Matteo Cococcioni <matteoc at MIT.EDU>:

> 
> Dear all,
> 
> I apologize for the message in italian. I was just telling Marco that we
> have
> experienced some problems with LAM 7.1.1 and PW 2.1.2 but, as far as I
> remember, the problem also appeared with older version of the codes (so that
> we
> decided to use lam 7.0.6).
> Now lam 7.2.1 is out and also 8.1 intel compilers but I haven't tried yet to
> use
>  the combination of them. Maybe they work.
> 
> sorry again,
> 
> Matteo 
> 
> 
> Quoting Marco Fornari <fornari at phy.cmich.edu>:
> 
> > Dear all,
> > 
> > I'm having this problem running PW 2.1.2 on a Pentium cluster
> > with LAM 7.1.1.1 and IFORT 8.0:
> > 
> >     G cutoff =  189.7462  (   2733 G-vectors)     FFT grid: ( 20, 20, 20)
> > 
> >     nbndx  =     4  nbnd   =     4  natomwfc =     8  npwx   =     181
> >     nelec  =    8.00 nkb   =     8  ngl    =      65
> > MPI_Allreduce: invalid operation: Invalid argument (rank 0,
> MPI_COMM_WORLD)
> > Rank (0, MPI_COMM_WORLD): Call stack within LAM:
> > Rank (0, MPI_COMM_WORLD):  - MPI_Allreduce()
> > Rank (0, MPI_COMM_WORLD):  - main()
> >
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > 
> > One of the processes started by mpirun has exited with a nonzero exit
> > code.  This typically indicates that the process finished in error.
> > If your process did not finish in error, be sure to include a "return
> > 0" or "exit(0)" in your C code before exiting the application.
> > 
> > PID 10516 failed on node n0 (10.0.0.1) with exit status 22.
> >
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > PW 2.1.1 works well on the same cluster. Did you encountered this
> > issue already?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Marco
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pw_forum mailing list
> > Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> > http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>