[Pw_forum] -D__NEW_PUNCH option
Paolo Giannozzi
giannozz at nest.sns.it
Thu Dec 2 15:48:34 CET 2004
On Thursday 02 December 2004 12:17, Sergey Lisenkov wrote:
> I would like to know about the status of -D__NEW_PUNCH option
superseded by input variable "wf_collect", as explained (sort of)
in the manual (but unfortunately not in the INPUT_PW file):
Note that each processor writes its own set of temporary
wavefunction files during the calculation. If wf_collect=.true. (in
namelist control), the final result is collected into a single file,
whose format is independent on the number of processors; otherwise,
one wavefunction file per processor is left on the disk. In the
latter case, the files are readable only by a job running on the
same number of processors and pools, and if all files are on a file
system that is visible to all processors (i.e., you cannot use local
scratch directories: there is presently no way to ensure that the
distribution of processes on processors will follow the same pattern
for different jobs).
> Is it possible to reduce a load of NFS?
write to local scratch disks. Note that you have no control on
which processor writes the output file if wf_collect=.true., so you
may have to hunt for your data file a little bit
Paolo
--
Paolo Giannozzi e-mail: giannozz at nest.sns.it
Scuola Normale Superiore Phone: +39/050-509876, Fax:-563513
Piazza dei Cavalieri 7 I-56126 Pisa, Italy
More information about the users
mailing list