[Pw_forum] a problem about the output of example2

[CLAUDIA BUNGARO]

Dear Felipe

there are a number of references in the literature  about ab initio
calculations of electronic + phonon contributions to the static dielectric
constant that you may find helpfull.

For example:
 Cockayne E and Burton BP PHYS REV B {\bf 62}, 3735 (2000)
 X. Zhao and D. Vanderbilt PRB {\bf 65}, 75105 (2002)

As a book I like for example:
 Peter Y. Yu and Manuel Cardona "Fundamentals of Semiconductors", Springer

Claudia


__________________________________________________
Dr. Claudia Bungaro
Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, Rutgers University
136 Frelinghuysen Road, Piscataway,  NJ 08854-8019

tel: +1 732 445 4197          fax: +1 732 445 4343
email: bungaro at physics.rutgers.edu
__________________________________________________


On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, FELIPE VALENCIA wrote:

>
> Dear Paolo,
>
> I am a little confused. As long as I knew, pwscf only dealt with the
> phonon contribution to the
> dielectric response, but it seems, from your reply, that there have
> been major changes and now you can study
> electronic contributions... ¿Is that true or, perhaps, I just
> misunderstood your reply?
>
> Felipe
>   > On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, Li Yu wrote:
> >
> > > [...] I can find the dielectric tensor of silicon.
> > > I wonder if it is the high frequency one, (I mean
> > > if the is only the electron contribution)
> >
> > it is
> >
> > > or it includes the ions contribution
> >
> > it doesn't
> >
> > Paolo
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pw_forum mailing list
> > Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> > http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>
>