[Pw_forum] A little question about total energy
NoahPark
baknoo at tokyo.rist.or.jp
Mon May 26 13:43:07 CEST 2003
Dear Users;
If USPP and NCPP are simultaneously used in the description of a certain
heterogeneous structure(with the same exchange-correlation functional),
is there any problem to figure out the total energy and binding energy ?
Best regards,
Noah
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paolo Giannozzi" <giannozz at nest.sns.it>
To: <pw_forum at pwscf.org>
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2003 10:28 PM
Subject: Re: [Pw_forum] A little question about total energy
> Hi
>
> > In the output of PWSCF, the energy partitions are list
> > following the total energy as I pasted below. I found
> > that the total energy is not equal to the sum of those listed
> > partitions.
>
> Total Energy = sum of terms marked with "+" below =
> one-electron + hartree + xc + ewald + correction for metals
>
> ! total energy = -62.07569469 ryd
> estimated scf accuracy < 0.00000799 ryd
>
> band energy sum = -14.82580512 ryd
> + one-electron contribution = -98.79712762 ryd
> + hartree contribution = 51.10053218 ryd
> + xc contribution = -14.02297161 ryd
> + ewald contribution = -0.34484385 ryd
> scf in/out correction = 0.02901784 ryd
> + correction for metals = -0.01128379 ryd
>
> The "one-electron contribution" is the kinetic + ionic term:
> \sum <psi| T + V_ion | psi>
> The "band energy sum" is exactly what it claims to be:
> \sum epsilon = \sum <psi| T + V_ion + V_scf | psi>
> The "correction for metals" makes forces and energies
> consistent if a broadening scheme is used.
> The "scf in/out correction" is no longer used
> (and no longer useful)
> The "estimated scf accuracy" gives an estimate of the
> error on the energy due to imperfect self-consistency.
>
> Admittedly, it is slightly confusing.
>
> Paolo
>
> --
> Paolo Giannozzi e-mail: giannozz at nest.sns.it
> Scuola Normale Superiore Phone: +39/050509412
> Piazza dei Cavalieri 7 Fax: +39/050509417, 050563513
> I-56126 Pisa, Italy Office: Lab. NEST, Via della Faggiola 19
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
More information about the users
mailing list