[Pw_forum] Electron-phonon coupling
Paolo Giannozzi
giannozz at nest.sns.it
Mon Mar 31 15:23:17 CEST 2003
Hi Gosia
> No, it is not not correct. Look to the definition of el-ph
> in one of Savrasov's papers and you will see that that there is
> double delta on Fermi surface. You can split the integration over
> phonon vectors (q-points) and over electron momentum (k-points)
> if you first integrate over phonons and later over electrons.
> Not the other way around. Just because there is delta_k+q delta_k .
the el-ph coefficients in PWscf are presently calculated by performing
the sum over k at a given q, then summing the results over q. Maybe
I haven't understood your point: are you implying that this is not correct?
While I agree that the present implementation is dumb and ineffective,
I don't see anything wrong with it.
> You try to integrate delta_k * delta_q or delta_k+q * delta_q
> if I understand correctly your e-mail.
> If you start from the integration over k first then at q=0 you meet
> the problem of delta_k*delta_k+0 which is mathematically not defined.
A gaussian broadening scheme is used to deal with the double delta.
In this scheme, the double delta should be defined also for q=0. Maybe
what bothers you is that in the q=0 limit the function to be summed
contains a 1/\omega^2 term. I "solved" the problem by averaging over
translated grids (that do not include q=0). For an estimate of \lambda -
that is what most people want - this should be good enough. For an
accurate value of \lambda, I don't know, but getting an accurate value
of \lambda is difficult anyway
Paolo
--
Paolo Giannozzi e-mail: giannozz at nest.sns.it
Scuola Normale Superiore Phone: +39/050509412
Piazza dei Cavalieri 7 Fax: +39/050509417, 050563513
I-56126 Pisa, Italy Office: Lab. NEST, Via della Faggiola 19
More information about the users
mailing list