[Thermo_pw-forum] Symmetry
Andrea Dal Corso
dalcorso at sissa.it
Wed Jun 24 23:51:01 CEST 2020
I would try using the same values for 2/3.
Andrea
Quoting Francisco Wellery Nunes Silva <wellery at fisica.ufc.br>:
> Dear Prof. Dalcorso,
>
> Thanks for you swift answer, in my input file I was already writing the
> atomic coordinates like this :
>
> Ga 0.6666666660 0.3333333330 0.9554400000
> Ga 0.6666666660 0.3333333330 0.0445600000
> S 0.3333333330 0.6666666670 0.0844001388
> S 0.3333333330 0.6666666670 0.9155998612
>
> Best,
> Wellery.
>
> Em qua., 24 de jun. de 2020 às 16:51, Andrea Dal Corso <dalcorso at sissa.it>
> escreveu:
>
>> Usually this is due to symmetry correct with 6 digits.
>> Adding more digits to the atomic coordinates
>> this error often disappears.
>> The problem is usually 1/3 or 2/3 written with 6 digits.
>>
>> Andrea
>> Quoting Francisco Wellery Nunes Silva <wellery at fisica.ufc.br>:
>>
>> > Dear thermo_pw users,
>> >
>> > I was wondering if there is any program to ensure the geometry of a
>> system
>> > before carring out a calculation. I've been using FINDSYM however, in
>> spite
>> > the symmetry found to be ok, in the calculation thermo_pw crashes under
>> the
>> > following error :
>> >
>> > from set_irr_sym_new : error # 111
>> > wrong representation
>> >
>> > Thanks in advance,
>> > Wellery.
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Thermo_pw-forum mailing list
>> Thermo_pw-forum at lists.quantum-espresso.org
>> https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/thermo_pw-forum
>>
>
>
> --
>
> *******************************************
> Dr. Francisco Wellery Nunes Silva.
> *******************************************
> Skype >> silvafwn
> *Research Associate at,*
> Laboratório de Microscopia Avançada -- LMA
> Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC),
> Caixa Postal 6030 ( Mail-Box 6030 )
> C.E.P -- 60.455-900
> Fortaleza - Ceará – Brasil
> *******************************************
More information about the Thermo_pw-forum
mailing list