[Q-e-developers] Something wrong due to the esm module

[Minoru Otani]

Dear Filippo,

Currently, the stress calculation part does not include the ESM calculation. Thus it should
be skipped. 

Now we are working on it to calculate the stress with ESM along the surface lateral direction.

Best regards,
Minoru

On Oct 27, 2015, at 7:30 AM, Filippo SPIGA <filippo.spiga at quantum-espresso.org> wrote:

> I confirm the files compiles (changes are simple), I have no specific test-cases to run that stress multiple parts of the ESM implementation, anything in the current test-suite?
> 
> --
> Mr. Filippo SPIGA, M.Sc.
> Quantum ESPRESSO Foundation
> http://fspiga.github.io ~ skype: filippo.spiga
> 
> *****
> Disclaimer: "Please note this message and any attachments are CONFIDENTIAL and may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. The contents are not to be disclosed to anyone other than the addressee. Unauthorized recipients are requested to preserve this confidentiality and to advise the sender immediately of any error in transmission."
> 
>> On Oct 26, 2015, at 9:55 PM, Filippo SPIGA <filippo.spiga at quantum-espresso.org> wrote:
>> 
>> I am giving a try as well.
>> 
>> --
>> Mr. Filippo SPIGA, M.Sc.
>> Quantum ESPRESSO Foundation
>> http://fspiga.github.io ~ skype: filippo.spiga
>> 
>> *****
>> Disclaimer: "Please note this message and any attachments are CONFIDENTIAL and may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. The contents are not to be disclosed to anyone other than the addressee. Unauthorized recipients are requested to preserve this confidentiality and to advise the sender immediately of any error in transmission."
>> 
>>> On Oct 26, 2015, at 9:22 PM, Paolo Giannozzi <p.giannozzi at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Could you please try the attached version? Paolo
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 9:25 PM, Davide Ceresoli <davide.ceresoli at istm.cnr.it> wrote:
>>> Let me also add 20130313 to the list of the "bad" ones.
>>> 
>>> D.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 10/26/2015 09:15 PM, Filippo SPIGA wrote:
>>>> Hello Xiaochuan,
>>>> 
>>>> Davide is right, it is a compiler problem, the FORTRAN seems correct to correct. Every other compiler work except two specific minor versions of Intel 13 (20130607, 20130514). For example another minor version of Intel 13.1 (icc (13.1.0 20130121) works.
>>>> 
>>>> HTH
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Mr. Filippo SPIGA, M.Sc.
>>>> Quantum ESPRESSO Foundation
>>>> http://fspiga.github.io ~ skype: filippo.spiga
>>>> 
>>>> *****
>>>> Disclaimer: "Please note this message and any attachments are CONFIDENTIAL and may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. The contents are not to be disclosed to anyone other than the addressee. Unauthorized recipients are requested to preserve this confidentiality and to advise the sender immediately of any error in transmission."
>>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Q-e-developers mailing list
>>> Q-e-developers at qe-forge.org
>>> http://qe-forge.org/mailman/listinfo/q-e-developers
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Paolo Giannozzi, Dept. Chemistry&Physics&Environment,
>>> Univ. Udine, via delle Scienze 208, 33100 Udine, Italy
>>> Phone +39-0432-558216, fax +39-0432-558222
>>> <esm.f90>_______________________________________________
>>> Q-e-developers mailing list
>>> Q-e-developers at qe-forge.org
>>> http://qe-forge.org/mailman/listinfo/q-e-developers
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Q-e-developers mailing list
>> Q-e-developers at qe-forge.org
>> http://qe-forge.org/mailman/listinfo/q-e-developers
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Q-e-developers mailing list
> Q-e-developers at qe-forge.org
> http://qe-forge.org/mailman/listinfo/q-e-developers