<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body style="overflow-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;">
Dear Wannier Users,
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Since there has been no response to my initial post, does anyone know if the postw90 code has been benchmarked for SHC?</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Thanks,</div>
<div>Vahid<br>
<div><br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>On Aug 24, 2025, at 3:55 PM, Vahid Askarpour <vh261281@dal.ca> wrote:</div>
<br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
<div>
<div>
<div class="BodyFragment"><font size="2"><span style="font-size:11pt;">
<div class="PlainText">Dear Wannier Users,<br>
<br>
In Scientific Reports (2025) 15:16354, the SHC of 1T’-MoS2 is calculated in Fig 4a and reaches a maximum of e^2/h at the Fermi level. I calculated the SHC of this material with Wannier90/Postw90 codes. The input files and the Fermi scan (Fermi energy=-2.474eV)
are attached. I get 0.05e^2/h at the Fermi level. I am not sure if the published data are incorrect, if there is a bug in the postw90 code or if I am missing something in my input. I would appreciate any input you might have on the source of this discrepancy.<br>
<br>
Thank you,<br>
Vahid<br>
<br>
Vahid Askarpour<br>
Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science<br>
Dalhousie University<br>
Halifax, Canada<br>
<br>
</div>
</span></font></div>
<div class="BodyFragment"><font size="2"><span style="font-size:11pt;">
<div class="PlainText">_______________________________________________<br>
Wannier mailing list<br>
Wannier@lists.quantum-espresso.org<br>
<a href="https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/wannier">https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/wannier</a><br>
</div>
</span></font></div>
</div>
<span id="cid:E9BC97FCD7B9094BA0A246218A193FCB@CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM"><MoS2_files.zip></span></div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</body>
</html>