<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif;font-size:small">Dear Wannier experts,</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif;font-size:small"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif;font-size:small">I was trying to calculate the MLWFs using Wannier90. I found that the lattice parameters for WFs using Wannier90 are very different than the ones obtained using DFT. Is it ok or there is some problem. </div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif;font-size:small"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif;font-size:small">Further, when I tried to plot the WFs using xcryden then these are found to be translated by some distance than the home unit cell. Is it possible to shift it into the home unit cell?</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif;font-size:small"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif;font-size:small">Kindly suggest me the same.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif;font-size:small"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif;font-size:small">Thank you in advance!</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif;font-size:small"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif;font-size:small">With regards,</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif;font-size:small">Payal </div></div>