<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Dear Hyungjun Lee,</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">thank you for spotting this. <br>
</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">It works now much better... a spread of
38 in the first iteration, which is very close to final value
around 37.</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Thank you,</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Marten<br>
</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 27.08.19 um 15:25 schrieb H. Lee:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAP8DXZi5VsujPrMbBq0SWSOf1xsxVOxYJn_a=v7fSKMCCV+_BA@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">Dear Marten:
<div><br>
</div>
<div>If I remember correctly, I obtained very small spreads
for all Wannier functions (WFs) even at the first iteration
for monolayer MoS2. The only differences from your inputs
are: (1) diagon='davidson' (2) use of NC or USPP for pseudo
potentials, but I thought that they are not important.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I thought that very large spreads for some WFs at the
first iteration in your case signals some problem.</div>
<div>So I checked your inputs and outputs again and found that
you made a mistake in specifying the atomic coordinates in
mos2.win; </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>replace "atom_frac" with "atom_cart" in mos2.win<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>That is, you started from very bad initial projections.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>The fact that the minimisation was slower in case of
precond=T tells us that in your case preconditioning can't
improve convergence; maybe you have to change some parameter
(alpha?) in wannierise.F90 (see the source code.)</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Sincerely,</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Hyungjun Lee</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 5:29
PM Marten Richter <<a
href="mailto:marten.richter@tu-berlin.de" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">marten.richter@tu-berlin.de</a>>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div
class="gmail-m_-8285569389342153002gmail-m_3494800929260992045moz-cite-prefix">Dear
Hyungjun Lee,</div>
<div
class="gmail-m_-8285569389342153002gmail-m_3494800929260992045moz-cite-prefix"><br>
</div>
<div
class="gmail-m_-8285569389342153002gmail-m_3494800929260992045moz-cite-prefix">I
have uploaded the files<br>
</div>
<div
class="gmail-m_-8285569389342153002gmail-m_3494800929260992045moz-cite-prefix"><span><span><a
href="https://gigamove.rz.rwth-aachen.de/d/id/vn482q3t4NHEeU"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://gigamove.rz.rwth-aachen.de/d/id/vn482q3t4NHEeU</a><br>
</span></span></div>
<div
class="gmail-m_-8285569389342153002gmail-m_3494800929260992045moz-cite-prefix"><br>
</div>
<div
class="gmail-m_-8285569389342153002gmail-m_3494800929260992045moz-cite-prefix">please
not that they use a different quantum espresso run than
the files provided before (higher cut off energy).<br>
But it does not change the overall behaviour.</div>
<div
class="gmail-m_-8285569389342153002gmail-m_3494800929260992045moz-cite-prefix"><br>
</div>
<div
class="gmail-m_-8285569389342153002gmail-m_3494800929260992045moz-cite-prefix">Thanks,</div>
<div
class="gmail-m_-8285569389342153002gmail-m_3494800929260992045moz-cite-prefix"><br>
</div>
<div
class="gmail-m_-8285569389342153002gmail-m_3494800929260992045moz-cite-prefix">Marten<br>
<span><span></span></span></div>
<div
class="gmail-m_-8285569389342153002gmail-m_3494800929260992045moz-cite-prefix"><br>
</div>
<div
class="gmail-m_-8285569389342153002gmail-m_3494800929260992045moz-cite-prefix">Am
27.08.19 um 07:55 schrieb H. Lee:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">Dear Marten Richter:
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Preconditioning in Wannier90 just filters the
components in the gradient due to the large
lattice vectors and it does not always improve
convergence; in some cases, it worsens the
convergence.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I want to know the final spreads of all Wannier
functions (WFs) for the cases of (1) precond=T and
(2) precond=F. (in your case, the 14th WF still
has the large spread of 7.8)</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Additionally, could you upload amn and mmn
files?<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Sincerely,</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Hyungjun Lee</div>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mon, Aug 26,
2019 at 9:38 PM Marten Richter <<a
href="mailto:marten.richter@tu-berlin.de"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">marten.richter@tu-berlin.de</a>>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px
0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div
class="gmail-m_-8285569389342153002gmail-m_3494800929260992045gmail-m_-6627916185210023166moz-cite-prefix">Dear
Marco,</div>
<div
class="gmail-m_-8285569389342153002gmail-m_3494800929260992045gmail-m_-6627916185210023166moz-cite-prefix">I
have found a solution.</div>
<div
class="gmail-m_-8285569389342153002gmail-m_3494800929260992045gmail-m_-6627916185210023166moz-cite-prefix">Besides
the missing guiding_centres = .true., I have
now set precond = false .<br>
This seems to have caused the problems, I am
wondering why it affected only one spin or was
this a coincidence?</div>
<div
class="gmail-m_-8285569389342153002gmail-m_3494800929260992045gmail-m_-6627916185210023166moz-cite-prefix"><br>
</div>
<div
class="gmail-m_-8285569389342153002gmail-m_3494800929260992045gmail-m_-6627916185210023166moz-cite-prefix">Thanks,</div>
<div
class="gmail-m_-8285569389342153002gmail-m_3494800929260992045gmail-m_-6627916185210023166moz-cite-prefix"><br>
</div>
<div
class="gmail-m_-8285569389342153002gmail-m_3494800929260992045gmail-m_-6627916185210023166moz-cite-prefix">Marten<br>
</div>
<div
class="gmail-m_-8285569389342153002gmail-m_3494800929260992045gmail-m_-6627916185210023166moz-cite-prefix"><br>
</div>
<div
class="gmail-m_-8285569389342153002gmail-m_3494800929260992045gmail-m_-6627916185210023166moz-cite-prefix">Am
22.08.19 um 15:27 schrieb Marten Richter:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div
class="gmail-m_-8285569389342153002gmail-m_3494800929260992045gmail-m_-6627916185210023166moz-cite-prefix">Dear
Marco,</div>
<div
class="gmail-m_-8285569389342153002gmail-m_3494800929260992045gmail-m_-6627916185210023166moz-cite-prefix">I
have now rerun the calculation with
guiding_centres = .true. .</div>
<div
class="gmail-m_-8285569389342153002gmail-m_3494800929260992045gmail-m_-6627916185210023166moz-cite-prefix">Here
is the wout <span><span><a
href="https://gigamove.rz.rwth-aachen.de/d/id/VU8FWXMMrYgyS9"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://gigamove.rz.rwth-aachen.de/d/id/VU8FWXMMrYgyS9</a>
for download.</span></span></div>
<div
class="gmail-m_-8285569389342153002gmail-m_3494800929260992045gmail-m_-6627916185210023166moz-cite-prefix"><span><span>The
spread is much smaller, however it seems
as if the algorithm is restarting since
the spread went up several times.</span></span></div>
<div
class="gmail-m_-8285569389342153002gmail-m_3494800929260992045gmail-m_-6627916185210023166moz-cite-prefix"><span><span>The
band along the kpath does look ok, even
though the conduction band SO splitting
seems to be too small.</span></span></div>
<div
class="gmail-m_-8285569389342153002gmail-m_3494800929260992045gmail-m_-6627916185210023166moz-cite-prefix"><span><span>Using
an interpolation from my code I still
get distortions (see surface plot) at
singular points.</span></span></div>
<div
class="gmail-m_-8285569389342153002gmail-m_3494800929260992045gmail-m_-6627916185210023166moz-cite-prefix"><span><span>Is
it possible, that single points from the
underlying DFT are broken? I have
compared my input files cutoff energy
and it is smaller than yours, can this
be the problem?<br>
</span></span></div>
<div
class="gmail-m_-8285569389342153002gmail-m_3494800929260992045gmail-m_-6627916185210023166moz-cite-prefix"><br>
</div>
<div
class="gmail-m_-8285569389342153002gmail-m_3494800929260992045gmail-m_-6627916185210023166moz-cite-prefix">Thank
you very much,<br>
</div>
<div
class="gmail-m_-8285569389342153002gmail-m_3494800929260992045gmail-m_-6627916185210023166moz-cite-prefix"><br>
</div>
<div
class="gmail-m_-8285569389342153002gmail-m_3494800929260992045gmail-m_-6627916185210023166moz-cite-prefix">Marten<br>
</div>
<div
class="gmail-m_-8285569389342153002gmail-m_3494800929260992045gmail-m_-6627916185210023166moz-cite-prefix"><br>
</div>
<div
class="gmail-m_-8285569389342153002gmail-m_3494800929260992045gmail-m_-6627916185210023166moz-cite-prefix"><br>
</div>
<div
class="gmail-m_-8285569389342153002gmail-m_3494800929260992045gmail-m_-6627916185210023166moz-cite-prefix"><br>
</div>
<div
class="gmail-m_-8285569389342153002gmail-m_3494800929260992045gmail-m_-6627916185210023166moz-cite-prefix"><br>
</div>
<div
class="gmail-m_-8285569389342153002gmail-m_3494800929260992045gmail-m_-6627916185210023166moz-cite-prefix">Am
21.08.19 um 10:39 schrieb Gibertini Marco:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"> Dear Marten,<br>
<br>
I did almost identical calculations few
years back (see <a
href="https://journals.aps.org/prb/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevB.90.245411"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">PRB
90, 245411 (2014)</a>) without any issue.<br>
Since I still have all data from Quantum
ESPRESSO (.mmn, .amn, .eig, .spn), I tried
to perform again the wannierization and
interpolation using the most recent version
of Wannier90 to check that no bug was
introduced in the meantime.<br>
<br>
I got exactly the same results as in 2014,
so I would rule out problems with Wannier90.<br>
<br>
The issue might then arise from pw2wannier90
(that I haven't checked yet) or from your
inputs.<br>
In this respect, a crucial difference I see
with respect to my input (which is otherwise
almost identical to yours, apart that I use
a 12x12x1 k-grid) is that you don't use
guiding_centres = .true.<br>
For 2D materials centred in the middle of
the unit cell along the vertical direction
(as in your case) the wannierization can go
nuts with guiding_centres = .false. (which
is the default value). Have you checked that
the spreads look reasonable? Can you send me
the .wout?<br>
<br>
Please, try to see if guiding_centres =
.true. solves your problems. If not, we'll
investigate further. <br>
<br>
Hope this helps!<br>
<br>
Marco
<pre class="gmail-m_-8285569389342153002gmail-m_3494800929260992045gmail-m_-6627916185210023166moz-signature" cols="72">--
****
Marco Gibertini
****************************************
Post-doctoral Research Scientist
Theory and Simulation of Materials
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne</pre>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<div
class="gmail-m_-8285569389342153002gmail-m_3494800929260992045gmail-m_-6627916185210023166moz-cite-prefix">On
8/20/19 11:47 AM, Marten Richter wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<p>Dear Wannier90 experts,</p>
<p>I am relatively new to Wannier90 and
also Quantum Espresso, but I need for
development some example file for
monolayer MoS2 including Spin Orbit
coupling.<br>
I will use the files generated by
Wannier90 to interpolate the
bandstructure and TB coefficients to a
1024x1024 grid using a custom code
(needs to be 2^n points).</p>
<p>I used files from <a
class="gmail-m_-8285569389342153002gmail-m_3494800929260992045gmail-m_-6627916185210023166moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="http://www.materialscloud.org"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">www.materialscloud.org</a>
as basis for the calculation I only
replaced the pseudo potentials with
relativistic potentials and I increased
the cutoff energy, since I get otherwise
non positive S in quantum espresso.<br>
</p>
<p>My problem is, that one Spin component
behaves fine and the other one shows
strong oscillations around the gamma
point. (visible the bandstructure
plotted by my code, but also in the
wannier post processing plot, both
attached). It gets better for more
iterations, but what is the reason for
the poor convergence.<br>
</p>
<p>I hope, this is the right list, since
it might be also a problem with quantum
espresso, but I did not want to cross
post.</p>
<p>Thank you very much in advance!<br>
</p>
<p>Best regards,</p>
<p>Marten Richter </p>
<pre class="gmail-m_-8285569389342153002gmail-m_3494800929260992045gmail-m_-6627916185210023166moz-signature" cols="72">------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Marten Richter
Institut für Theoretische Physik
Technische Universität Berlin
Hardenbergstr. 36 Sekr. EW 7-1
D-10623 Berlin
Germany
------------------------------------------------------------
email: <a class="gmail-m_-8285569389342153002gmail-m_3494800929260992045gmail-m_-6627916185210023166moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:marten.richter@tu-berlin.de" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">marten.richter@tu-berlin.de</a>
Tel: +49-30-314-24858 (office)
Fax: +49-30-314-21130
<a class="gmail-m_-8285569389342153002gmail-m_3494800929260992045gmail-m_-6627916185210023166moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.itp.TU-Berlin.DE/knorr/" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">http://www.itp.TU-Berlin.DE/knorr/</a>
------------------------------------------------------------
File for scf calculation
&CONTROL
calculation = 'scf'
outdir = './'
prefix = 'mos2'
pseudo_dir = './'
restart_mode = 'from_scratch'
verbosity = 'high'
/
&SYSTEM
degauss = 2.0000000000d-02
ecutrho = 3.0000000000d+02
ecutwfc = 4.375000000000d+01
! ecutrho = 2.4000000000d+02
! ecutwfc = 3.5000000000d+01
!! ecutrho = 4.8000000000d+02
!! ecutwfc = 7.0000000000d+01
assume_isolated = '2D'
ibrav = 0
nat = 3
ntyp = 2
occupations = 'smearing'
smearing = 'cold'
noncolin = .true.
lspinorb = .true.
/
&ELECTRONS
conv_thr = 3.0000000000d-09
diago_full_acc = .true.
diagonalization = 'cg'
electron_maxstep = 100
/
ATOMIC_SPECIES
Mo 95.94 Mo.rel-pbe-spn-kjpaw_psl.1.0.0.UPF
S 32.066 S.rel-pbe-nl-kjpaw_psl.1.0.0.UPF
ATOMIC_POSITIONS angstrom
Mo 0.0000000000 1.8406963043 11.5773510440
S 1.5940897602 0.9203481522 10.0188259936
S 1.5940897602 0.9203481522 13.1358760945
K_POINTS crystal
625
0.00000000 0.00000000 0.00000000 1.600000e-03
should represent a 25x25 grid, cut out here
CELL_PARAMETERS angstrom
3.1881795204 0.0000000000 0.0000000000
-1.5940897602 2.7610444565 0.0000000000
0.0000000000 0.0000000000 23.1547020881
File for nscf calculation
&CONTROL
calculation = 'bands'
outdir = './'
prefix = 'mos2'
pseudo_dir = './'
restart_mode = 'restart'
verbosity = 'high'
/
&SYSTEM
degauss = 2.0000000000d-02
ecutrho = 3.0000000000d+02
ecutwfc = 4.375000000000d+01
! ecutrho = 2.4000000000d+02
! ecutwfc = 3.5000000000d+01
!! ecutrho = 4.8000000000d+02
!! ecutwfc = 7.0000000000d+01
ibrav = 0
assume_isolated = '2D'
nat = 3
ntyp = 2
occupations = 'smearing'
smearing = 'cold'
noncolin = .true.
lspinorb = .true.
/
&ELECTRONS
conv_thr = 3.0000000000d-09
diago_full_acc = .true.
diagonalization = 'cg'
electron_maxstep = 100
/
ATOMIC_SPECIES
Mo 95.94 Mo.rel-pbe-spn-kjpaw_psl.1.0.0.UPF
S 32.066 S.rel-pbe-nl-kjpaw_psl.1.0.0.UPF
ATOMIC_POSITIONS angstrom
Mo 0.0000000000 1.8406963043 11.5773510440
S 1.5940897602 0.9203481522 10.0188259936
S 1.5940897602 0.9203481522 13.1358760945
K_POINTS crystal
625
0.00000000 0.00000000 0.00000000 1.600000e-03
Rest cut out here
CELL_PARAMETERS angstrom
3.1881795204 0.0000000000 0.0000000000
-1.5940897602 2.7610444565 0.0000000000
0.0000000000 0.0000000000
23.1547020881
File for wannier90 input
&inputpp
outdir = './'
prefix = 'mos2'
seedname = 'mos2'
spin_component = 'none'
write_mmn = .true.
write_amn = .true.
write_unk = .false.
write_dmn = .false.
write_spn = .true.
read_sym = .false.
wan_mode = 'standalone'
/
File for wannier90 input
bands_plot = true
#restart = plot
write_hr = true
write_rmn = true
write_bvec = true
write_u_matrices = true
spinors = true
spin_decomp = true
kpath = true
kpath_task = bands
kpath_bands_colour = spin
num_wann = 22
num_iter = 3600
num_bands = 22
exclude_bands = 1-12
wannier_plot=.false.
wannier_plot_supercell = 3
precond = true
trial_step = 1.0
begin atoms_frac
Mo 0.0000000000 1.8406963043 11.5773510440
S 1.5940897602 0.9203481522 10.0188259936
S 1.5940897602 0.9203481522 13.1358760945
end atoms_frac
begin projections
Mo:dxy;dyz;dxz;dx2-y2;dz2
S:px;py;pz
end projections
begin kpoint_path
G 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 M 0.50000 0.0000 0.0000000
M 0.500000 0.000000 0.000000 K 0.666666 -0.333333 0.0000000
K 0.666666 -0.333333 0.000000 KP 0.333333 -0.666666 0.000000
KP 0.333333 -0.666666 0.000000 G 0.00000 0.0000 0.0000000
end kpoint_path
begin unit_cell_cart
3.1881795204 0.0000000000 0.0000000000
-1.5940897602 2.7610444565 0.0000000000
0.0000000000 0.0000000000 23.1547020881
end unit_cell_cart
mp_grid : 25 25 1
begin kpoints
0.00000000 0.00000000 0.00000000
0.00000000 0.04000000 0.00000000
snip should be the same 25x25 grid
end kpoints
</pre>
<br>
<fieldset
class="gmail-m_-8285569389342153002gmail-m_3494800929260992045gmail-m_-6627916185210023166mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<pre class="gmail-m_-8285569389342153002gmail-m_3494800929260992045gmail-m_-6627916185210023166moz-quote-pre">_______________________________________________
Wannier mailing list
<a class="gmail-m_-8285569389342153002gmail-m_3494800929260992045gmail-m_-6627916185210023166moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Wannier@lists.quantum-espresso.org" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">Wannier@lists.quantum-espresso.org</a>
<a class="gmail-m_-8285569389342153002gmail-m_3494800929260992045gmail-m_-6627916185210023166moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/wannier" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/wannier</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<fieldset
class="gmail-m_-8285569389342153002gmail-m_3494800929260992045gmail-m_-6627916185210023166mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<pre class="gmail-m_-8285569389342153002gmail-m_3494800929260992045gmail-m_-6627916185210023166moz-quote-pre">_______________________________________________
Wannier mailing list
<a class="gmail-m_-8285569389342153002gmail-m_3494800929260992045gmail-m_-6627916185210023166moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Wannier@lists.quantum-espresso.org" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">Wannier@lists.quantum-espresso.org</a>
<a class="gmail-m_-8285569389342153002gmail-m_3494800929260992045gmail-m_-6627916185210023166moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/wannier" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/wannier</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
<pre class="gmail-m_-8285569389342153002gmail-m_3494800929260992045gmail-m_-6627916185210023166moz-signature" cols="72">--
------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Marten Richter
Institut für Theoretische Physik
Technische Universität Berlin
Hardenbergstr. 36 Sekr. EW 7-1
D-10623 Berlin
Germany
------------------------------------------------------------
email: <a class="gmail-m_-8285569389342153002gmail-m_3494800929260992045gmail-m_-6627916185210023166moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:marten.richter@tu-berlin.de" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">marten.richter@tu-berlin.de</a>
Tel: +49-30-314-24858 (office)
Fax: +49-30-314-21130
<a class="gmail-m_-8285569389342153002gmail-m_3494800929260992045gmail-m_-6627916185210023166moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.itp.TU-Berlin.DE/knorr/" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">http://www.itp.TU-Berlin.DE/knorr/</a>
------------------------------------------------------------
</pre>
<br>
<fieldset
class="gmail-m_-8285569389342153002gmail-m_3494800929260992045gmail-m_-6627916185210023166mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<pre class="gmail-m_-8285569389342153002gmail-m_3494800929260992045gmail-m_-6627916185210023166moz-quote-pre">_______________________________________________
Wannier mailing list
<a class="gmail-m_-8285569389342153002gmail-m_3494800929260992045gmail-m_-6627916185210023166moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Wannier@lists.quantum-espresso.org" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">Wannier@lists.quantum-espresso.org</a>
<a class="gmail-m_-8285569389342153002gmail-m_3494800929260992045gmail-m_-6627916185210023166moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/wannier" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/wannier</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
<pre class="gmail-m_-8285569389342153002gmail-m_3494800929260992045gmail-m_-6627916185210023166moz-signature" cols="72">--
------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Marten Richter
Institut für Theoretische Physik
Technische Universität Berlin
Hardenbergstr. 36 Sekr. EW 7-1
D-10623 Berlin
Germany
------------------------------------------------------------
email: <a class="gmail-m_-8285569389342153002gmail-m_3494800929260992045gmail-m_-6627916185210023166moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:marten.richter@tu-berlin.de" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">marten.richter@tu-berlin.de</a>
Tel: +49-30-314-24858 (office)
Fax: +49-30-314-21130
<a class="gmail-m_-8285569389342153002gmail-m_3494800929260992045gmail-m_-6627916185210023166moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.itp.TU-Berlin.DE/knorr/" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">http://www.itp.TU-Berlin.DE/knorr/</a>
------------------------------------------------------------
</pre>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br>
Wannier mailing list<br>
<a
href="mailto:Wannier@lists.quantum-espresso.org"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">Wannier@lists.quantum-espresso.org</a><br>
<a
href="https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/wannier"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/wannier</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
<pre class="gmail-m_-8285569389342153002gmail-m_3494800929260992045moz-signature" cols="72">--
------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Marten Richter
Institut für Theoretische Physik
Technische Universität Berlin
Hardenbergstr. 36 Sekr. EW 7-1
D-10623 Berlin
Germany
------------------------------------------------------------
email: <a class="gmail-m_-8285569389342153002gmail-m_3494800929260992045moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:marten.richter@tu-berlin.de" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">marten.richter@tu-berlin.de</a>
Tel: +49-30-314-24858 (office)
Fax: +49-30-314-21130
<a class="gmail-m_-8285569389342153002gmail-m_3494800929260992045moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.itp.TU-Berlin.DE/knorr/" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">http://www.itp.TU-Berlin.DE/knorr/</a>
------------------------------------------------------------
</pre>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Marten Richter
Institut für Theoretische Physik
Technische Universität Berlin
Hardenbergstr. 36 Sekr. EW 7-1
D-10623 Berlin
Germany
------------------------------------------------------------
email: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:marten.richter@tu-berlin.de">marten.richter@tu-berlin.de</a>
Tel: +49-30-314-24858 (office)
Fax: +49-30-314-21130
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.itp.TU-Berlin.DE/knorr/">http://www.itp.TU-Berlin.DE/knorr/</a>
------------------------------------------------------------
</pre>
</body>
</html>