<div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div>So, that means Quantum-Espresso gives an extensive density of states, right? if so, then it should have a Volume^-1 in its unit.</div><div dir="ltr"><br></div><div dir="ltr">Regards,<br>
Salman<br></div></div></div></div></div><br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Sat, Nov 13, 2021 at 2:46 PM Stefano Baroni <<a href="mailto:baroni@sissa.it">baroni@sissa.it</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="auto">
it depends on the volume of the unit cell. once you divide by it, you get an intensive (volume-independent) quantity. sb<br>
<br>
<div dir="ltr">
<div><span style="background-color:rgba(255,255,255,0)">___</span></div>
<div><span style="background-color:rgba(255,255,255,0)">Stefano Baroni, Trieste -- <a href="http://stefano.baroni.me" target="_blank">http://stefano.baroni.me</a></span></div>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
<blockquote type="cite">On 13 Nov 2021, at 20:29, Salman Zarrini <<a href="mailto:salman.zarrini@gmail.com" target="_blank">salman.zarrini@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Dear Giovanni,</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Thanks for your response.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Then, considering the density of states in an electronic system and what Quantum-Espresso calculates as the density of states, should we expect to have a volume-independent quantity? if I understood you correctly!</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">Regards,<br>
Salman<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Sat, Nov 13, 2021 at 1:30 PM Giovanni Cantele <<a href="mailto:giovanni.cantele@spin.cnr.it" target="_blank">giovanni.cantele@spin.cnr.it</a>> wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
Dear Salman,<br>
<br>
Actually, the two definitions are not mutually exclusive. The first you speak about, is the density of states per unit volume and, as you correctly mention, has units Energy^-1 Volume^-1. However, the definition of density of states a system of electrons and
has units Energy^-1:<br>
<br>
DOS(E) = sum_i Dirac_delta(E-E_i)<br>
<br>
Integral( dE DOS(E) ) = number of electrons<br>
<br>
What Quantum-Espresso calculates, is the density of states of the electron system in the unit cell of a given Bravais lattice (due to periodicity, you refer to the primitive cell). If you plot it as is, you should give it units eV^-1. However, you could need
the density of states per unit volume. In that case, you can easily obtain the unit cell volume of your system, divide the computed density of states by it, and then the resulting density-of-states-per-unit-volume has units eV^-1 au^-3 (if you express the
volume in au^3).<br>
<br>
In this case, if you integrate over the energy, you obtain number of electrons per unit volume, that is, electron density.<br>
<br>
Giovanni<br>
<br>
> On 13 Nov 2021, at 19:14, Salman Zarrini <<a href="mailto:salman.zarrini@gmail.com" target="_blank">salman.zarrini@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> <br>
> Dearl all,<br>
> <br>
> As the density of states's definition implies, the electronic density of states has a unit of "Number of electronic states per Energy per Volume" or simply Volume^-1 Energy^-1. However, the "Volume^-1" is apparently missing in the unit of density of states
in literatures as well as here in manual/tutorials of Quantum-Espresso. So that the Energy^-1 is used as the unit for total density of states, atomic site projected density of states and orbital projected density of states.
<br>
> <br>
> I guess it is just a misunderstanding from my side, so, I would be thankful if one could elaborate further on that.<br>
> <br>
> Regards,<br>
> Salman<br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (<a href="http://www.max-centre.eu" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">www.max-centre.eu</a>)<br>
> users mailing list <a href="mailto:users@lists.quantum-espresso.org" target="_blank">
users@lists.quantum-espresso.org</a><br>
> <a href="https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users</a><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (<a href="http://www.max-centre.eu" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">www.max-centre.eu</a>)<br>
users mailing list <a href="mailto:users@lists.quantum-espresso.org" target="_blank">
users@lists.quantum-espresso.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<span>_______________________________________________</span><br>
<span>Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (<a href="http://www.max-centre.eu" target="_blank">www.max-centre.eu</a>)</span><br>
<span>users mailing list <a href="mailto:users@lists.quantum-espresso.org" target="_blank">users@lists.quantum-espresso.org</a></span><br>
<span><a href="https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users" target="_blank">https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users</a></span></div>
</blockquote>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br>
Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (<a href="http://www.max-centre.eu" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">www.max-centre.eu</a>)<br>
users mailing list <a href="mailto:users@lists.quantum-espresso.org" target="_blank">users@lists.quantum-espresso.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users</a></blockquote></div>