<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#954F72;
text-decoration:underline;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style></head><body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink="#954F72"><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal>Hello Dr. Thomas,</p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>First of all, I would like to thank you for giving your inputs on my case last week. I do hope you can still extend a helping hand on this predicament of mine. </p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>I would like to give you an update on my predicament on optimization process. Attached in this email is my input file in which the eamp was set to zero. During calculations, the results are still oscillating for each iteration. I didn’t stopped the calculation but I can see that it’s not going better. It even gave a positive value for calculated scf energy per iteration as seen in this pic:</p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><a href="https://cviscpshs-my.sharepoint.com/:i:/g/personal/jaabrea_cvisc_pshs_edu_ph/Eat1rLSbCO9Mth7ra0er6PwBfrWsXtUj9s7f_mOPkckzgA?e=lQWb4L">https://cviscpshs-my.sharepoint.com/:i:/g/personal/jaabrea_cvisc_pshs_edu_ph/Eat1rLSbCO9Mth7ra0er6PwBfrWsXtUj9s7f_mOPkckzgA?e=lQWb4L</a></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>The accuracies for each iteration are very low for each iteration as seen in this pic:</p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><a href="https://cviscpshs-my.sharepoint.com/:i:/g/personal/jaabrea_cvisc_pshs_edu_ph/Ebnkk0mfJjlKiFkMffu63HkBYml45BOtNl3q8JjB_JkTJQ?e=ZRpyqc">https://cviscpshs-my.sharepoint.com/:i:/g/personal/jaabrea_cvisc_pshs_edu_ph/Ebnkk0mfJjlKiFkMffu63HkBYml45BOtNl3q8JjB_JkTJQ?e=ZRpyqc</a></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Then let me share to you the ongoing result for the magnetization for each iteration in this pic:</p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><a href="https://cviscpshs-my.sharepoint.com/:i:/g/personal/jaabrea_cvisc_pshs_edu_ph/Eat1rLSbCO9Mth7ra0er6PwBrm1Ki8UqakTaleeJ8Nleng?e=4oIMv9">https://cviscpshs-my.sharepoint.com/:i:/g/personal/jaabrea_cvisc_pshs_edu_ph/Eat1rLSbCO9Mth7ra0er6PwBrm1Ki8UqakTaleeJ8Nleng?e=4oIMv9</a></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>I hope you can shed light to this matter Dr. Thomas. I’m not sure now as to why the Mn cannot undergo proper optimization unlike the Fe and Co.</p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Best regards,</p><p class=MsoNormal>Jayfe</p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Sent from <a href="https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986">Mail</a> for Windows 10</p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div></body></html>