<html>Thank you,<br />pot_extrapolation='none' combined with wfc_extrapolation='none' does the trick.<br /><br />Antoine Jay<br />LAAS-CNRS<br />Toulouse, France<br /><br /><br />Le Lundi, Août 03, 2020 13:06 CEST, Paolo Giannozzi <p.giannozzi@gmail.com> a écrit:<br /> <blockquote type="cite" cite="CAPMgbCvA6xUP4dtONR75jSGULODJsNYM1JvP0BAg8_ZAkRAhYg@mail.gmail.com"><div dir="ltr"><div>Try pot_extrapolation='none'</div><div> </div><div>Paolo</div></div> <div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 12:49 PM Antoine Jay <<a href="mailto:ajay@laas.fr">ajay@laas.fr</a>> wrote:</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Dear all,<br />Is it possible to perform a relaxation calculation without using the charge density of the previous geometry?<br />startingpot and startingwfc have no influence on the second optimized geometry...<br /><br />Best regards,<br /><br />Antoine Jay<br />LAAS-CNRS<br />Toulouse, France _______________________________________________<br />Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (<a rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" href="http://www.max-centre.eu/quantum-espresso">www.max-centre.eu/quantum-espresso</a>)<br />users mailing list <a target="_blank" href="mailto:users@lists.quantum-espresso.org">users@lists.quantum-espresso.org</a><br /><a rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" href="https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users">https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users</a></blockquote></div><br clear="all" /><br />--<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div>Paolo Giannozzi, Dip. Scienze Matematiche Informatiche e Fisiche,<br />Univ. Udine, via delle Scienze 208, 33100 Udine, Italy<br />Phone +39-0432-558216, fax +39-0432-558222<br /> </div></div></div></div></div></blockquote><br /><br /><br /> </html>