<div dir="ltr"><div><div><div><span class="gmail-im">Dear Prof. Marzari,<br></span></div><span class="gmail-im">Thanks a lot for your invaluable response.<br></span></div><span class="gmail-im">Regards<br></span></div><span class="gmail-im">CMI Okoye<br></span></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all"><div><div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div><div><div><i>------------------------------<br>Chukwuemeka M I <b>Okoye</b><br></i></div><i>Department of Physics and Astronomy,<br></i></div><i>University of Nigeria, <br></i></div><i>Nsukka, Enugu State,<br></i></div><i>Nigeria</i><br><div>Telephone: +234 7038766990<br></div><div>E-mail: <a href="mailto:cmi.okoye@unn.edu.ng" target="_blank">cmi.okoye@unn.edu.ng</a><br></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 4:19 PM, Nicola Marzari <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:nicola.marzari@epfl.ch" target="_blank">nicola.marzari@epfl.ch</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On 06/07/2017 16:53, Chukwuemeka Okoye wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Dear Prof. Nicola Marzari,<br>
<br>
Thank you so much for your suggestions.<br>
<br>
At the moment, I am actually interested in comparing the same 1: 1: 1: 1 stoichiometry for the quaternary compound, but different atom arrangements e.g.Type-I: 1 A atom(0,0,0), 1 B atom(.5,.5,.5), 1 C atom(0.25,0.25,0.25), 1 D atom(0.75,0.75,0.75)<br>
<br>
Type-II: 1 A atom(0,0,0), 1 B atom(0.25,0.25,0.25), 1 C atom(0.5,0.5,0.5), 1 D atom(0.75,0.75,0.75)<br>
<br>
Type-III: 1 A atom(0,0,0), 1 B atom(0.25,0.25,0.25), 1 C atom(0.75,0.75,0.75), 1 D atom(0.5,0.5,0.5) .<br>
<br>
These calculations are performed with the same pseudo-potentials.<br>
<br>
Really, my worry is on the relevance of the total energies in determining the most stable configuration of atomic arrangement since Quantum Espresso is not an all-electron method.<br>
<br>
Thanks<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br></span>
I think you'll be fine, but read the literature I sent. You raise<br>
several questions?<br>
<br>
1) is QE able to reproduce all-electron<br>
results. The answer is yes, broadly speaking, and especially I would say<br>
for relative changes in the formation energies (rather than the absolute ones). Not to mention that all-electron results with one code do not<br>
agree perfectly with another code - so there is no truth. Read:<br>
<a href="https://molmod.ugent.be/deltacodesdft" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://molmod.ugent.be/deltac<wbr>odesdft</a><br>
<br>
2) is PBE, or PBESOL, or whatever xc potential, good enough for the thermodynamics of solids? Mostly yes, but not always. But typically good enough for your problem, since you are asking relative rankings of very similar systems.<br>
<br>
3) are your chosen pseudopotentials good? my suggestion is for <a href="http://materialscloud.org/sssp" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://materialscloud.org/sssp</a><wbr>, remembering to cite who made the<br>
original pseudos<br>
<br>
4) remember also that you are calculating total energies at 0K; would the free energies at 500K be ordered in the same way? probably yes,<br>
for your case, but it's relevant for systems where e.g. configurational<br>
entropy is large (alloys).<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
<br>
nicola</font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
------------------------------<wbr>------------------------------<wbr>----------<br>
Prof Nicola Marzari, Chair of Theory and Simulation of Materials, EPFL<br>
Director, National Centre for Competence in Research NCCR MARVEL, EPFL<br>
<a href="http://theossrv1.epfl.ch/Main/Contact" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://theossrv1.epfl.ch/Main/<wbr>Contact</a> <a href="http://nccr-marvel.ch/en/project" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://nccr-marvel.ch/en/proje<wbr>ct</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>